Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Sciences, Bixby Center for Global Reproductive Health, University of California San Francsico, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Ryan Residency Training Program, University of California San Francisco, San Francisco, CA, USA.
Reprod Health. 2024 Nov 24;21(1):171. doi: 10.1186/s12978-024-01908-9.
Since the Dobbs vs. Jackson Women's Health Organization decision in June 2022, providers throughout the U.S. have been navigating the shifting legal landscape of abortion bans, which diminish the delivery of evidence-based healthcare. The Dobbs decision has had a detrimental impact on medical training, the physician-patient relationship, and provision of medical care. However, few studies have captured the effects on providers in adjacent fields, including contraceptive care. Our objective was to examine the impact of Dobbs on contraceptive care.
We conducted semi-structured in-depth interviews (August 2022-July 2024), with 41 contraceptive healthcare providers across the US, with the majority (63%) in abortion restrictive states. We utilized deductive thematic analysis to assess providers' practice changes and experiences related to contraceptive services.
In reaction to the Dobbs decision, providers noted increased requests for contraception, especially for highly effective methods. Providers worried that certain methods, such as IUDs or emergency contraception, would become restricted, and mentioned advance provision of pills and other ways that they would try to ensure supplies. Providers also discussed that their patients were worried about threats to contraception, including for adolescents. Some expressed concern, however, that the abortion bans may prompt providers to overemphasize high-efficacy methods with directive counseling. Providers shared that it was stressful to practice in contexts of uncertainty, with shifting abortion policies affecting contraceptive care, including emergent needs such as providing contraceptive services to out-of-state patients before they go home. Several providers shared that they felt an increased importance of their role in their communities, and a deepened commitment to advocate for their patients.
Abortion restrictions profoundly impact providers' contraceptive counseling and care. The effects of Dobbs on providers and their clinical practices underscore providers' legally precarious position in today's reproductive health landscape. Attention to contraceptive access and person-centered care has become a salient public health need across the U.S. The long-term impacts of limited reproductive rights may stretch an already under-resourced healthcare system and further emphasize moral pressures.
自 2022 年 6 月多布斯诉杰克逊妇女健康组织案以来,美国各地的医疗服务提供者一直在应对堕胎禁令不断变化的法律环境,这减少了循证医疗保健的提供。多布斯案对医疗培训、医患关系和医疗服务的提供产生了不利影响。然而,很少有研究捕捉到多布斯案对包括避孕护理在内的相邻领域提供者的影响。我们的目的是研究多布斯案对避孕护理的影响。
我们对美国各地的 41 名避孕保健提供者进行了半结构化深入访谈(2022 年 8 月至 2024 年 7 月),其中大多数(63%)在堕胎限制州。我们利用演绎主题分析来评估提供者与避孕服务相关的实践变化和经验。
针对多布斯案的裁决,提供者注意到对避孕的需求增加,特别是对高效方法的需求。提供者担心某些方法,如宫内节育器或紧急避孕药,将受到限制,并提到提前提供药丸和其他方法,他们将尝试确保供应。提供者还讨论了他们的患者对避孕的担忧,包括青少年。然而,一些人担心,堕胎禁令可能会促使提供者过分强调具有指导咨询的高效方法。提供者表示,在不确定的情况下行医压力很大,堕胎政策的不断变化影响避孕护理,包括为即将离开的州外患者提供避孕服务等紧急需求。一些提供者表示,他们感到自己在社区中的角色更加重要,对患者的承诺更加坚定。
堕胎限制对提供者的避孕咨询和护理产生了深远影响。多布斯案对提供者及其临床实践的影响凸显了提供者在当今生殖健康领域中法律上不稳定的地位。对避孕机会和以患者为中心的护理的关注已成为美国各地的一个突出公共卫生需求。有限的生殖权利的长期影响可能会使本已资源不足的医疗体系进一步紧张,并进一步强调道德压力。