• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

澳大利亚和新西兰 2004-2007 年辅助生殖技术周期的比较分析。

A comparative analysis of assisted reproductive technology cycles in Australia and New Zealand 2004-2007.

机构信息

Department of Obstetrics and Gynaecology, University of Auckland, National Womens Hospital, Private Bag 92 189, Auckland 3, New Zealand.

出版信息

Hum Reprod. 2010 Sep;25(9):2281-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq187. Epub 2010 Jul 22.

DOI:10.1093/humrep/deq187
PMID:20650968
Abstract

BACKGROUND

There are different funding arrangements for fertility treatments between New Zealand (NZ) and Australia. In NZ, there are two options for patients accessing treatment: either meeting specified criteria for age, no smoking and BMI for publicly funding or funding their own treatment. This differs from Australia, which has no explicit eligibility criteria restricting access to fertility treatment. An analysis of assisted reproductive technology (ART) in Australia and NZ was undertaken to consider the impact of these different funding approaches.

METHODS

Data were extracted from the Australian and New Zealand Assisted Reproduction Database between 2004 and 2007. A total of 116 111 autologous fresh cycles were included.

RESULTS

In Australia, more cycles were in women aged 40 years or older compared with those in NZ (23.5 versus 16.0%, P < 0.01). Single embryo transfer was more common in NZ than that in Australia, in women < 35 years of age (75.1 versus 59.6%, P < 0.01). In women <35 years, the crude rates of clinical pregnancy (37.5 versus 31.2%, P < 0.01) and live delivery (31.6 versus 26%, P < 0.01) following fresh ART cycles were significantly higher in NZ than that in Australia. These differences in outcomes persisted in older age groups.

CONCLUSIONS

The purpose of the criteria used in NZ to access public funding for fertility treatments is to optimize pregnancy outcomes. This approach has resulted in a healthier population of women undergoing treatment and may explain the improved pregnancy outcomes seen in NZ couples who undergo fertility treatments.

摘要

背景

新西兰(NZ)和澳大利亚在生育治疗方面有不同的资金安排。在 NZ,患者有两种选择:要么符合特定的年龄、不吸烟和 BMI 标准,以获得公共资金资助,要么自费治疗。这与澳大利亚不同,澳大利亚没有明确的资格标准限制生育治疗的获取。对澳大利亚和 NZ 的辅助生殖技术(ART)进行了分析,以考虑这些不同资金方法的影响。

方法

从 2004 年至 2007 年,从澳大利亚和新西兰辅助生殖数据库中提取数据。共纳入 116111 例自体新鲜周期。

结果

在澳大利亚,40 岁及以上女性的周期数多于 NZ(23.5%比 16.0%,P < 0.01)。在年龄<35 岁的女性中,NZ 比澳大利亚更常见单胚胎移植(75.1%比 59.6%,P < 0.01)。在年龄<35 岁的女性中,新鲜 ART 周期后的临床妊娠率(37.5%比 31.2%,P < 0.01)和活产率(31.6%比 26%,P < 0.01)均明显高于澳大利亚。这些结果差异在年龄较大的组中仍然存在。

结论

NZ 用于获得公共资金资助生育治疗的标准旨在优化妊娠结局。这种方法导致接受治疗的女性人群更健康,这可能解释了 NZ 夫妇接受生育治疗后妊娠结局改善的原因。

相似文献

1
A comparative analysis of assisted reproductive technology cycles in Australia and New Zealand 2004-2007.澳大利亚和新西兰 2004-2007 年辅助生殖技术周期的比较分析。
Hum Reprod. 2010 Sep;25(9):2281-9. doi: 10.1093/humrep/deq187. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
2
Development of clinical priority access criteria for assisted reproduction and its evaluation on 1386 infertile couples in New Zealand.制定新西兰辅助生殖临床优先准入标准及其对 1386 对不孕夫妇的评估
Hum Reprod. 2012 Jan;27(1):131-41. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der372. Epub 2011 Nov 10.
3
Assisted reproductive technology: public funding and the voluntary shift to single embryo transfer in Australia.辅助生殖技术:澳大利亚公共资金与自愿向单胚胎移植的转变。
Med J Aust. 2011 Nov 21;195(10):594-8. doi: 10.5694/mja10.11448.
4
Insurance mandates, embryo transfer, outcomes--the link is tenuous.保险授权、胚胎移植、结果——联系很薄弱。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Dec;94(7):2776-9. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.05.037. Epub 2010 Jun 26.
5
Accessing fertility treatment in New Zealand: a comparison of the clinical priority access criteria with a prediction model for couples with unexplained subfertility.在新西兰获取生育治疗:对不明原因不孕夫妇的预测模型与临床优先准入标准的比较。
Hum Reprod. 2011 Nov;26(11):3037-44. doi: 10.1093/humrep/der279. Epub 2011 Sep 6.
6
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.加拿大的辅助生殖技术(ART):2002年加拿大ART登记处的结果。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5):1356-64. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.030.
7
Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States.美国辅助生殖技术中心的准入
Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(3):745-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.037. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
8
Success rates and cost of a live birth following fresh assisted reproduction treatment in women aged 45 years and older, Australia 2002-2004.2002 - 2004年澳大利亚45岁及以上女性新鲜辅助生殖治疗后的活产成功率及成本
Hum Reprod. 2008 Jul;23(7):1639-43. doi: 10.1093/humrep/den102. Epub 2008 Apr 15.
9
Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.美国的辅助生殖技术:2001年美国生殖医学学会/辅助生殖技术协会登记处的结果
Fertil Steril. 2007 Jun;87(6):1253-66. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.056. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
10
Cycle 1 as predictor of assisted reproductive technology treatment outcome over multiple cycles: an analysis of linked cycles from the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcomes Reporting System online database.周期 1 预测多次周期辅助生殖技术治疗结局:来自辅助生殖技术协会临床结果报告系统在线数据库的连锁周期分析。
Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):600-5. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.06.009. Epub 2010 Jul 18.

引用本文的文献

1
A comparison of perinatal outcomes following fresh blastocyst or cleavage stage embryo transfer in singletons and twins and between singleton siblings.单胎和双胎中新鲜囊胚或卵裂期胚胎移植后围产期结局的比较以及单胎同胞之间的比较。
Hum Reprod Open. 2023 Mar 8;2023(2):hoad003. doi: 10.1093/hropen/hoad003. eCollection 2023.
2
N-acetylcysteine for polycystic ovary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled clinical trials.N-乙酰半胱氨酸治疗多囊卵巢综合征:随机对照临床试验的系统评价和荟萃分析
Obstet Gynecol Int. 2015;2015:817849. doi: 10.1155/2015/817849. Epub 2015 Jan 8.
3
Perinatal mortality following assisted reproductive technology treatment in Australia and New Zealand, a public health approach for international reporting of perinatal mortality.
澳大利亚和新西兰辅助生殖技术治疗后的围产儿死亡率:国际围产儿死亡率报告的公共卫生方法。
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2013 Sep 18;13:177. doi: 10.1186/1471-2393-13-177.
4
Should there be a female age limit on public funding for assisted reproductive technology?是否应该对公共资金用于辅助生殖技术设定女性年龄限制?
J Bioeth Inq. 2013 Mar;10(1):79-91. doi: 10.1007/s11673-012-9415-6. Epub 2013 Jan 4.