• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

美国辅助生殖技术中心的准入

Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States.

机构信息

Section of Urology, Dartmouth-Hitchcock Medical Center, Lebanon, New Hampshire, USA.

出版信息

Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(3):745-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.037. Epub 2008 Dec 10.

DOI:10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.037
PMID:19081563
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To describe the disparity of assisted reproductive technology (ART) centers in the United States as they relate to residential locations of populations in their reproductive years and state-mandated coverage for infertility services.

DESIGN

Cross-sectional study.

SETTING

Population in reproductive years (women 20-44 years; men 20-49 years) based on US Census 2000 data. Assisted reproductive technology centers registered with the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology (SART) in 2005.

MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Populations within service area served by in-state and neighboring state ART centers as defined by a 60-minute travel time along road networks from each center.

RESULT(S): Service areas for 387 of 390 ART centers were calculated. Fourteen states had some form of mandated coverage. Underserved states included Alaska, Montana, Wyoming, and West Virginia. The northeastern United States had the greatest percentage of overserved population with 66%-100% study population within 60 minutes of an ART center. Female age stratification showed the highest age group (35-44 years) per state in northern New England and the youngest in Utah and District of Columbia. Median total study population within 60 minutes of an ART center in their own state was higher in mandated versus nonmandated states.

CONCLUSION(S): Disparity of access to care for infertility services exists from the standpoint of population service areas for ART centers and state-mandated coverage. Female age stratification may help anticipate future need for services with existing resource distribution.

摘要

目的

描述美国辅助生殖技术(ART)中心的差异,这些差异与生殖年龄段人口的居住地点以及州规定的不孕服务覆盖范围有关。

设计

横断面研究。

设置

基于美国 2000 年人口普查数据,处于生殖年龄段的人口(女性 20-44 岁;男性 20-49 岁)。2005 年,在美国生殖技术协会(SART)注册的辅助生殖技术中心。

主要观察指标

根据各中心的公路网络,60 分钟的旅行时间,确定每个州内和相邻州内 ART 中心服务区域内的人口。

结果

计算了 390 个 ART 中心中的 387 个服务区域。14 个州有某种形式的强制覆盖范围。服务不足的州包括阿拉斯加、蒙大拿州、怀俄明州和西弗吉尼亚州。美国东北部地区的服务过剩人口比例最高,有 66%-100%的研究人群在 60 分钟内到达 ART 中心。按州划分的女性年龄分层显示,新英格兰北部的最高年龄组(35-44 岁)和犹他州和哥伦比亚特区的最年轻年龄组。在自己所在州的 60 分钟内,ART 中心内的中位数总研究人群在有强制规定和无强制规定的州中更高。

结论

从 ART 中心的人口服务区域和州规定的覆盖范围来看,获得不孕服务的机会存在差异。女性年龄分层可能有助于根据现有资源分布情况预测未来对服务的需求。

相似文献

1
Access to assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States.美国辅助生殖技术中心的准入
Fertil Steril. 2010 Feb;93(3):745-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.10.037. Epub 2008 Dec 10.
2
Distribution of male infertility specialists in relation to the male population and assisted reproductive technology centers in the United States.美国男性不育专家的分布与男性人口以及辅助生殖技术中心的关系。
Fertil Steril. 2010 Jul;94(2):599-609. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2009.02.012. Epub 2009 Apr 9.
3
Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.保险授权与不孕症治疗趋势。
Fertil Steril. 2008 Jan;89(1):66-73. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.167. Epub 2007 May 7.
4
The relative contribution of assisted reproductive technologies and ovulation induction to multiple births in the United States 5 years after the Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology/American Society for Reproductive Medicine recommendation to limit the number of embryos transferred.美国辅助生殖技术协会/美国生殖医学学会建议限制移植胚胎数量五年后,辅助生殖技术和促排卵对美国多胎妊娠的相对贡献。
Fertil Steril. 2007 Dec;88(6):1554-61. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2007.01.112. Epub 2007 May 4.
5
The status of public reporting of clinical outcomes in assisted reproductive technology.辅助生殖技术中临床结局报告的公开情况。
Fertil Steril. 2013 Sep;100(3):736-41. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.05.012. Epub 2013 Jun 10.
6
Assisted reproductive technology in the United States: 2001 results generated from the American Society for Reproductive Medicine/Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology registry.美国的辅助生殖技术:2001年美国生殖医学学会/辅助生殖技术协会登记处的结果
Fertil Steril. 2007 Jun;87(6):1253-66. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.11.056. Epub 2007 Feb 2.
7
Geographic access to assisted reproductive technology health care in the United States: a population-based cross-sectional study.美国辅助生殖技术医疗保健的地理可及性:一项基于人群的横断面研究。
Fertil Steril. 2017 Apr;107(4):1023-1027. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2017.02.101. Epub 2017 Mar 11.
8
Low priority level for infertility services within the public health sector: a Brazilian case study.公共卫生部门的不孕服务优先级较低:巴西案例研究。
Hum Reprod. 2010 Feb;25(2):430-5. doi: 10.1093/humrep/dep405. Epub 2009 Nov 17.
9
Coverage and current practice patterns regarding assisted reproduction techniques.辅助生殖技术的覆盖范围及当前实践模式。
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2008 May;138(1):3-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2008.02.006. Epub 2008 Apr 1.
10
Assisted reproductive technologies (ART) in Canada: 2002 results from the Canadian ART Register.加拿大的辅助生殖技术(ART):2002年加拿大ART登记处的结果。
Fertil Steril. 2006 Nov;86(5):1356-64. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.04.030.

引用本文的文献

1
Decreasing Fertility Rate in the United States: Demographics, Challenges, and Consequences.美国生育率下降:人口统计学、挑战与后果
Mayo Clin Proc. 2024 Nov;99(11):1693-1697. doi: 10.1016/j.mayocp.2024.09.004.
2
Determinants of utilization of infertility services by race and ethnicity in a state with a comprehensive infertility mandate.在一个对不孕症有全面规定的州,按种族和民族划分的不孕症服务利用的决定因素。
Fertil Steril. 2025 Apr;123(4):709-717. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2024.10.036. Epub 2024 Oct 31.
3
Geographic Access to Fertility Counseling among Adolescent and Young Adult Women with Cancer in North Carolina.
北卡罗来纳州癌症青少年和年轻女性获得生育咨询的地理途径。
Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2024 Sep 3;33(9):1194-1202. doi: 10.1158/1055-9965.EPI-24-0482.
4
Experiences and outcomes of fertility testing in male adolescents with sickle cell disease.镰状细胞病男性青少年生育力检测的经验和结果。
Pediatr Blood Cancer. 2024 Apr;71(4):e30848. doi: 10.1002/pbc.30848. Epub 2024 Jan 10.
5
REI clinics and fellowship training-a national snapshot to improve access to reproductive care.REI 诊所和奖学金培训——改善生殖保健服务可及性的全国性快照。
J Assist Reprod Genet. 2023 Sep;40(9):2101-2108. doi: 10.1007/s10815-023-02868-y. Epub 2023 Jun 28.
6
How far will they go? Distance and driving times that north American men travel to see a reproductive urologist.他们会走多远?北美人去看生殖泌尿科医生的距离和驾驶时间。
Andrologia. 2022 Nov;54(10):e14551. doi: 10.1111/and.14551. Epub 2022 Aug 24.
7
Impact of satellite clinics on geographic access to assisted reproductive technology services in the United States.卫星诊所对美国辅助生殖技术服务地理可及性的影响。
BMC Health Serv Res. 2022 Jul 19;22(1):928. doi: 10.1186/s12913-022-08281-y.
8
Access to Fertility Care in Geographically Underserved Populations, a Second Look.地理上服务不足人群的生育护理获取,再探。
Reprod Sci. 2022 Jul;29(7):1983-1987. doi: 10.1007/s43032-022-00991-2. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
9
"Online" and "at-home" versus traditional models of health care: enhancing access or impeding optimal therapeutics?“线上”和“居家”医疗模式与传统医疗模式:是增加了就医机会还是阻碍了最佳治疗效果?
Fertil Steril. 2020 Sep;114(3):476-482. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2020.07.017.
10
Patient identified factors influencing decisions to seek fertility care: adaptation of a wellness model.患者确定影响寻求生育保健决策的因素:健康模型的适应。
J Reprod Infant Psychol. 2021 Jul;39(3):263-275. doi: 10.1080/02646838.2019.1705263. Epub 2019 Dec 20.