Suppr超能文献

新的振荡测量设备(Arteriograph)测量增强指数、中心血压和主动脉脉搏波速度的侵袭性验证。

Invasive validation of a new oscillometric device (Arteriograph) for measuring augmentation index, central blood pressure and aortic pulse wave velocity.

机构信息

aHeart Institute, Medical School, University of Pécs, Pécs, Hungary bDepartment of Cardiology, University of Rome La Sapienza, Polo Pontino, Italy.

出版信息

J Hypertens. 2010 Oct;28(10):2068-75. doi: 10.1097/HJH.0b013e32833c8a1a.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The importance of measuring aortic pulse wave velocity (PWVao), aortic augmentation index (Aix) and central systolic blood pressure (SBPao) has been shown under different clinical conditions; however, information on these parameters is hard to obtain. The aim of this study was to evaluate the accuracy of a new, easily applicable oscillometric device (Arteriograph), determining these parameters simultaneously, against invasive measurements.

METHODS

Aortic Aix, SBPao and PWVao were measured invasively during cardiac catheterization in 16, 55 and 22 cases, respectively, and compared with the values measured by the Arteriograph.

RESULTS

We found strong correlation between the invasively measured aortic Aix and the oscillometrically measured brachial Aix on either beat-to-beat or mean value per patient basis (r = 0.9, P < 0.001; r = 0.94, P < 0.001), which allowed the noninvasive calculation of the aortic Aix without using generalized transfer function. Similarly strong correlation (r = 0.95, P < 0.001) was found between the invasively measured and the noninvasively calculated central SBPao; furthermore, the BHS assessment of the paired differences fulfilled the 'B' grading. The PWVao values measured invasively and by Arteriograph were 9.41 ± 1.8 m/s and 9.46 ± 1.8 m/s, respectively (mean ± SD); furthermore, the Pearson's correlation was 0.91 (P < 0.001). The limits of agreement were 11.4% for aortic Aix and 1.59 m/s for PWVao.

CONCLUSION

Aix, SBPao and PWVao, measured oscillometrically, showed strong correlation with the invasively obtained values. The observed limits of agreement are encouragingly low for accepting the method for clinical use. Our results suggest that the PWVao values, measured by Arteriograph, are close to the true aortic PWV, determined invasively.

摘要

背景

在不同的临床情况下,测量主动脉脉搏波速度(PWVao)、主动脉增强指数(Aix)和中心收缩压(SBPao)的重要性已经得到了证明;然而,这些参数的信息很难获得。本研究旨在评估一种新的、易于应用的示波法设备(Arteriograph)同时测量这些参数的准确性,该设备与侵入性测量相比。

方法

在 16、55 和 22 例患者的心脏导管检查中分别测量了主动脉 Aix、SBPao 和 PWVao,并与 Arteriograph 测量值进行比较。

结果

我们发现,在逐搏和患者平均值的基础上,侵入性测量的主动脉 Aix 与示波法测量的肱动脉 Aix 之间存在很强的相关性(r = 0.9,P < 0.001;r = 0.94,P < 0.001),这使得无需使用广义传递函数即可无创计算主动脉 Aix。同样,在侵入性测量和非侵入性计算的中心 SBPao 之间也发现了很强的相关性(r = 0.95,P < 0.001);此外,配对差异的 BHS 评估符合“B”级。侵入性测量和 Arteriograph 测量的 PWVao 值分别为 9.41 ± 1.8 m/s 和 9.46 ± 1.8 m/s(平均值 ± SD);此外,Pearson 相关系数为 0.91(P < 0.001)。主动脉 Aix 的一致性界限为 11.4%,PWVao 的一致性界限为 1.59 m/s。

结论

示波法测量的 Aix、SBPao 和 PWVao 与侵入性测量值具有很强的相关性。观察到的一致性界限对于接受该方法用于临床应用是令人鼓舞的。我们的结果表明,Arteriograph 测量的 PWVao 值与侵入性确定的真实主动脉 PWV 接近。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验