Takazawa Kenji, Kobayashi Hideyuki, Shindo Naohisa, Tanaka Nobuhiro, Yamashina Akira
Department of Cardiology, Tokyo Medical University Hachioji Medical Center, Japan.
Hypertens Res. 2007 Mar;30(3):219-28. doi: 10.1291/hypres.30.219.
Since a decrease of central aortic pressure contributes to the prevention of cardiovascular events, simple measurement of not only brachial blood pressure but also central aortic pressure may be useful in the prevention and treatment of cardiovascular diseases. In this study, we simultaneously measured radial artery pulse waves non-invasively and ascending aortic pressure invasively, before and after the administration of nicorandil. We then compared changes in central aortic pressure and radial arterial blood pressure calibrated with brachial blood pressure in addition to calculating the augmentation index (AI) at the aorta and radial artery. After nicorandil administration, the reduction in maximal systolic blood pressure in the aorta (Deltaa-SBP) was -14+/-15 mmHg, significantly larger than that in early systolic pressure in the radial artery (Deltar-SBP) (-9+/-12 mmHg). The reduction in late systolic blood pressure in the radial artery (Deltar-SBP2) was -15+/-14 mmHg, significantly larger than Deltar-SBP, but not significantly different from Deltaa-SBP. There were significant relationships between Deltaa-SBP and Deltar-SBP (r=0.81, p<0.001), and between Deltaa-SBP and Deltar-SBP2 (r=0.91, p<0.001). The slope of the correlation regression line with Deltar-SBP2 (0.83) was larger and closer to 1 than that with Deltar-SBP (0.63), showing that the relationship was close to 1:1. Significant correlations were obtained between aortic AI (a-AI) and radial AI (r-AI) (before nicorandil administration: r=0.91, p<0.001; after administration: r=0.70, p<0.001). These data suggest that the measurement of radial artery pulse wave and observation of changes in the late systolic blood pressure in the radial artery (r-SBP2) in addition to the ordinary measurement of brachial blood pressure may enable a more accurate evaluation of changes in maximal systolic blood pressure in the aorta (a-SBP).
由于中心主动脉压的降低有助于预防心血管事件,因此不仅简单测量肱动脉血压,同时测量中心主动脉压可能对心血管疾病的防治有用。在本研究中,我们在给予尼可地尔前后,分别采用无创方法测量桡动脉脉搏波和有创方法测量升主动脉压。然后,我们比较了中心主动脉压和经肱动脉血压校准的桡动脉血压的变化,并计算了主动脉和桡动脉的增强指数(AI)。给予尼可地尔后,主动脉最大收缩压降低值(Δa-SBP)为-14±15 mmHg,显著大于桡动脉收缩早期压降低值(Δr-SBP)(-9±12 mmHg)。桡动脉收缩晚期压降低值(Δr-SBP2)为-15±14 mmHg,显著大于Δr-SBP,但与Δa-SBP无显著差异。Δa-SBP与Δr-SBP之间存在显著相关性(r=0.81,p<0.001),Δa-SBP与Δr-SBP2之间也存在显著相关性(r=0.91,p<0.001)。与Δr-SBP2相关回归直线的斜率(0.83)大于与Δr-SBP相关回归直线的斜率(0.63)且更接近1,表明两者关系接近1:1。主动脉AI(a-AI)与桡动脉AI(r-AI)之间存在显著相关性(给予尼可地尔前:r=0.91,p<0.001;给予后:r=0.70,p<0.001)。这些数据表明,除常规测量肱动脉血压外,测量桡动脉脉搏波并观察桡动脉收缩晚期血压(r-SBP2)的变化,可能有助于更准确地评估主动脉最大收缩压(a-SBP)的变化。