Leroy Piet L J M, Schipper Daphne M, Knape Hans J T A
Pediatric Sedation Unit, Department of Pediatrics, Maastricht University Medical Centre, P.O. Box 5800, 6202 AZ Maastricht, The Netherlands.
Int J Pediatr. 2010;2010:934298. doi: 10.1155/2010/934298. Epub 2010 Jun 28.
Objectives. To investigate which skills and competence are imperative to assure optimal effectiveness and safety of procedural sedation (PS) in children and to analyze the underlying levels of evidence. Study Design and methods. Systematic review of literature published between 1993 and March 2009. Selected papers were classified according to their methodological quality and summarized in evidence-based conclusions. Next, conclusions were used to formulate recommendations. Results. Although the safety profiles vary among PS drugs, the possibility of potentially serious adverse events and the predictability of depth and duration of sedation define the imperative skills and competence necessary for a timely recognition and appropriate management. The level of effectiveness is mainly determined by the ability to apply titratable PS, including deep sedation using short-acting anesthetics for invasive procedures and nitrous oxide for minor painful procedures, and the implementation of non-pharmacological techniques. Conclusions. PS related safety and effectiveness are determined by the circumstances and professional skills rather than by specific pharmacologic characteristics. Evidence based recommendations regarding necessary skills and competence should be used to set up training programs and to define which professionals can and cannot be credentialed for PS in children.
目的。探讨哪些技能和能力对于确保儿童程序性镇静(PS)的最佳效果和安全性至关重要,并分析其证据的潜在水平。研究设计与方法。对1993年至2009年3月发表的文献进行系统综述。根据所选论文的方法学质量进行分类,并总结为基于证据的结论。接下来,利用这些结论制定建议。结果。尽管不同PS药物的安全性有所不同,但潜在严重不良事件的可能性以及镇静深度和持续时间的可预测性决定了及时识别和恰当处理所需的必要技能和能力。有效性水平主要取决于应用可滴定PS的能力,包括在侵入性操作中使用短效麻醉剂进行深度镇静以及在轻微疼痛操作中使用氧化亚氮,以及实施非药物技术。结论。PS相关的安全性和有效性取决于具体情况和专业技能,而非特定的药理学特性。关于必要技能和能力的循证建议应用于设立培训项目,并确定哪些专业人员可以或不可以获得儿童PS的资质认证。