Department of Surgery, King's College Hospital, Denmark Hill, London, SE5 9RS, UK.
Surg Endosc. 2011 Feb;25(2):649-50. doi: 10.1007/s00464-010-1237-1. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
Laparoscopic surgery via a single port is an evolving technique being applied to an increasing variety of operations [1]. Multiple series over the past 3 years have shown single-incision laparoscopic cholecystectomy to be feasible and safe [2]. The ergonomic difficulties of single-port laparoscopy include a loss of instrument triangulation and operation with camera and instruments in parallel. Many different modifications of techniques and equipment have been used to compensate. Single-port techniques have been applied by a few authors to laparoscopic nephrectomy [3], splenectomy [4], and obesity surgery [5, 6]. Laparoscopic liver resection is well established and shown to be safe in multiple series [7]. The laparoscopic approach is accepted as the gold standard for resection of segments 2 and 3 [8]. To the authors' knowledge, no reports of laparoscopic liver resection via a single port have been published. They report the use of their technique for single-incision laparoscopic left lateral segmentectomy in a patient with a solitary segment 2 colorectal liver metastasis. The authors maintained strict oncologic principles and adhered to their standard laparoscopic technique as far as possible. They used a TriPort (Advanced Surgical Concepts, Wicklow, Ireland) placed via a 12-mm incision at the umbilicus. Following diagnostic laparoscopy and intraoperative liver ultrasound, hepatic attachments were divided using electrocautery. Parenchymal transection and vascular control were achieved using an ultrasonic dissector and laparoscopic staplers. Standard straight laparoscopic instruments were used. A number of technical challenges were apparent. Movement of instruments was jerky at times, either because instruments were clashing with one another other or deflecting the camera. The multiport device can be stiff, requiring copious lubrication throughout surgery. Crossing hands facilitates internal triangulation of the operating instruments to allow retraction or to apply tension, for example, during the division of hepatic attachments. Control of minor hemorrhage is possible with judicious and patient application of pressure using small pieces of surgical gauze. An articulating laparoscopic stapler is useful to achieve the ideal angle of staple deployment during transection of vascular pedicles. The specimen was extracted by extending the umbilical incision. No complications occurred. The patient was able to resume an oral diet and full mobility free of opioid analgesia on the first postoperative day. The resection margin was clear. This video demonstrates that the authors' technique is feasible and oncologically safe for selected patients requiring liver resection.
经单孔腹腔镜手术是一种不断发展的技术,目前已应用于越来越多的手术中[1]。过去 3 年来的多项系列研究表明,单切口腹腔镜胆囊切除术是可行且安全的[2]。单孔腹腔镜手术的人体工程学困难包括仪器三角测量的丢失以及与相机和仪器平行操作[3]。许多不同的技术和设备修改已被用于补偿。一些作者已经将单孔技术应用于腹腔镜肾切除术[3]、脾切除术[4]和肥胖症手术[5,6]。腹腔镜肝切除术已在多项系列研究中得到证实且安全[7]。腹腔镜方法被接受为切除 2 段和 3 段的金标准[8]。据作者所知,尚无经单孔腹腔镜肝切除术的报道。他们报告了在一名孤立性第 2 段结直肠肝转移患者中使用他们的技术进行单切口腹腔镜左外叶切除术的情况。作者严格遵守肿瘤学原则,并尽可能遵循他们的标准腹腔镜技术。他们使用了通过脐部 12mm 切口放置的 TriPort(Advanced Surgical Concepts,Wicklow,Ireland)。在诊断性腹腔镜检查和术中肝脏超声检查后,使用电烙术分离肝附着处。使用超声刀和腹腔镜吻合器进行肝实质横断和血管控制。标准直式腹腔镜器械用于手术。出现了一些技术挑战。有时器械的运动不顺畅,要么是因为器械相互碰撞,要么是因为它们使相机发生偏转。多端口设备可能会很僵硬,因此在整个手术过程中都需要大量的润滑。交叉双手有助于操作器械的内部三角化,以便例如在分离肝附着处时进行回缩或施加张力。明智而耐心地使用小块手术纱布施加压力,可控制小量出血。在血管蒂横断时,使用关节式腹腔镜吻合器可实现理想的吻合钉部署角度。标本通过扩大脐部切口取出。患者无并发症发生。术后第一天,患者即可恢复口服饮食并完全自由活动,无需阿片类镇痛药。切缘无肿瘤残留。该视频演示了作者的技术对于需要肝切除术的选定患者是可行且具有肿瘤安全性的。