Department of Internal Medicine, District Hospital Sigmaringen, Sigmaringen, Germany.
Ultraschall Med. 2010 Oct;31(5):492-9. doi: 10.1055/s-0029-1245591. Epub 2010 Jul 22.
The aim of this prospective multicenter study was to assess the diagnostic role of CEUS in the diagnosis of newly discovered focal liver lesions in clinical practice. One important aspect is the comparison of CEUS with magnetic resonance imaging (MRI).
From 05 / 2004 to 12 / 2006, standardized CEUS was performed prospectively on 1349 patients with focal liver lesions that had been newly detected by fundamental ultrasound in order to determine tumor differentiation and tumor entity. 269 patients had a standardized MRI after CEUS. In typical liver hemangioma and focal nodular hyperplasia (FNH), the definitive diagnosis was based on the MRI as the "diagnostic gold standard" and on clinical evidence and additional follow-up (subgroup A) or on histology (subgroup B). 262 patients met the diagnostic standard that had been set.
In the subcollective (n = 262), the tumor differentiation (malignant or benign) of CEUS and MRI was concordant in 225 cases (85.9%), and the assessment of tumor entity in 204 cases (77.9%). In subgroup A (n = 180), concordant results for tumor differentiation were obtained in 169 (93.2%) and for tumor entity in 160 (88.9%) cases. Liver hemangiomas (n = 122) and FNH (n = 43) were most frequent. Subgroup B (n = 82) comprised mainly malignant liver lesions (n = 55), with only a few of hemangiomas (n = 8) or FNH (n = 5). Tumor differentiation was concordant in 56 (68.3%) and tumor entity in 44 cases (53.7%). There were no statistically proven differences between CEUS and MRI.
CEUS and MRI are of equal value for the differentiation and specification of newly discovered liver tumors in clinical practice. CEUS and MRI are extremely reliable for the differentiation of benign and malignant lesions, the diagnosis of liver hemangiomas and FNH. The characterization of metastases and HCC is also very reliable.
本前瞻性多中心研究旨在评估超声造影(CEUS)在临床实践中诊断新发现的局灶性肝脏病变的诊断作用。一个重要方面是将 CEUS 与磁共振成像(MRI)进行比较。
2004 年 5 月至 2006 年 12 月,对 1349 例因基础超声新发现的局灶性肝脏病变患者进行了前瞻性标准化 CEUS,以确定肿瘤分化和肿瘤实体。CEUS 后有 269 例患者进行了标准化 MRI。在典型的肝血管瘤和局灶性结节性增生(FNH)中,根据 MRI 作为“诊断金标准”和临床证据以及其他随访(亚组 A)或组织学(亚组 B)来确定明确诊断。262 例患者符合既定的诊断标准。
在亚组(n = 262)中,CEUS 和 MRI 的肿瘤分化(恶性或良性)在 225 例(85.9%)中一致,肿瘤实体在 204 例(77.9%)中一致。在亚组 A(n = 180)中,肿瘤分化的结果在 169 例(93.2%)和肿瘤实体的结果在 160 例(88.9%)中一致。肝血管瘤(n = 122)和 FNH(n = 43)最常见。亚组 B(n = 82)主要包括恶性肝病变(n = 55),仅有少数血管瘤(n = 8)或 FNH(n = 5)。肿瘤分化在 56 例(68.3%)中一致,肿瘤实体在 44 例(53.7%)中一致。CEUS 和 MRI 之间没有统计学上的差异。
CEUS 和 MRI 在临床实践中对新发现的肝脏肿瘤的分化和特异性具有同等价值。CEUS 和 MRI 对良性和恶性病变、肝血管瘤和 FNH 的诊断非常可靠。转移瘤和 HCC 的特征也非常可靠。