Barratt M D, Brantom P G, Fentem J H, Gerner I, Walker A P, Worth A P
SEAC Toxicology Centre (formerly the Environmental Safety Laboratory), Unilever Research, Colworth House, Sharnbrook, Bedford MK44 1LQ, UK.
Toxicol In Vitro. 1998 Aug;12(4):471-82. doi: 10.1016/s0887-2333(98)00021-6.
An international validation study on in vitro tests for skin corrosivity was conducted during 1996 and 1997 under the auspices of the European Centre for the Validation of Alternative Methods (ECVAM). The main objectives of the study were to assess the performances of selected in vitro tests in discriminating between: (a) corrosives (C) and non-corrosives (NC), for selected groups of chemicals (e.g. organic acids, phenols) and/or for all chemicals (single chemical entities only); and (b) known R35 (UN packing group I) and R34 (UN packing groups II & III) chemicals. Each test was evaluated for reliability and relevance by using a test set of 60 coded chemicals. In this paper, the test chemicals used in the validation study are identified; they include organic acids (6C/5NC), organic bases (7C/3NC), neutral organics (9NC), phenols (2C/3NC), inorganic acids (6C/1NC), inorganic bases (2C/2NC), inorganic salts (1C/2NC), electrophiles (3C/5NC) and soaps/surfactants (3NC). The in vivo classifications and important physicochemical properties (e.g. logP, pKa) of the test chemicals are given. The main criterion for including chemicals in the test set was that their corrosivity classifications were based on unequivocal animal data. Where available, structure-activity information was also used to support the corrosivity classifications. Despite the small numbers of chemicals in some of the categories, it was felt that the test set chosen represented the best possible for evaluating the performances of the in vitro tests for predicting skin corrosivity, given the limited availability of unequivocal animal data. The prediction of skin corrosivity from pH data was also investigated for those chemicals with extreme pH values (i.e. pH2 or 11.5). Nine of the 12 strongly acidic or alkaline chemicals in the test set, which were predicted to be C on the basis of their pH values, had also been found to be C in vivo.
1996年至1997年期间,在欧洲替代方法验证中心(ECVAM)的支持下,开展了一项关于皮肤腐蚀性体外试验的国际验证研究。该研究的主要目的是评估所选体外试验在区分以下两类物质时的性能:(a)对于选定的化学品组(如有机酸、酚类)和/或所有化学品(仅单一化学物质),区分腐蚀性物质(C)和非腐蚀性物质(NC);(b)区分已知的R35(联合国包装类别I)和R34(联合国包装类别II和III)化学品。通过使用一组60种编码化学品对每个试验进行可靠性和相关性评估。本文确定了验证研究中使用的试验化学品;它们包括有机酸(6种腐蚀性/5种非腐蚀性)、有机碱(7种腐蚀性/3种非腐蚀性)、中性有机物(9种非腐蚀性)、酚类(2种腐蚀性/3种非腐蚀性)、无机酸(6种腐蚀性/1种非腐蚀性)、无机碱(2种腐蚀性/2种非腐蚀性)、无机盐(1种腐蚀性/2种非腐蚀性)、亲电试剂(3种腐蚀性/5种非腐蚀性)和肥皂/表面活性剂(3种非腐蚀性)。给出了试验化学品的体内分类和重要的物理化学性质(如logP、pKa)。将化学品纳入试验组的主要标准是其腐蚀性分类基于明确的动物数据。如有可用,结构-活性信息也用于支持腐蚀性分类。尽管某些类别中的化学品数量较少,但鉴于明确的动物数据有限,认为所选的试验组代表了评估体外试验预测皮肤腐蚀性性能的最佳选择。对于那些具有极端pH值(即pH2或11.5)的化学品,还研究了根据pH数据预测皮肤腐蚀性的情况。试验组中12种强酸性或强碱性化学品中有9种根据其pH值预测为腐蚀性物质,在体内也被发现为腐蚀性物质。