Sustainable Livestock Systems Group, Scottish Agricultural College, West Mains Road, Edinburgh EH9 3JG, UK.
Meat Sci. 2010 Nov;86(3):770-9. doi: 10.1016/j.meatsci.2010.06.020. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
The potential of X-ray computed tomography (CT) as a predictor of cuts composition and meat quality traits using a multivariate calibration method (partial least square regression, PLSR) was investigated in beef cattle. Sirloins from 88 crossbred Aberdeen Angus (AAx) and 106 Limousin (LIMx) cattle were scanned using spiral CT. Subsequently, they were dissected and analyzed for technological and sensory parameters, as well as for intramuscular fat (IMF) content and fatty acid composition. CT-PLSR calibrations, tested by cross-validation, were able to predict with high accuracy the subcutaneous fat (R2, RMSECV=0.94, 34.60 g and 0.92, 34.46 g), intermuscular fat (R2, RMSECV=0.81, 161.54 g and 0.86, 42.16 g), total fat (R2, RMSECV=0.89, 65.96 g and 0.93, 48.35 g) and muscle content (R2, RMSECV=0.99, 58.55 g and 0.97, 57.45 g) in AAx and LIMx samples, respectively. Accurate CT predictions were found for fatty acid profile (R2=0.61-0.75) and intramuscular fat content (R2=0.71-0.76) in both sire breeds. However, low to very low accuracies were obtained for technological and sensory traits with R2 ranged from 0.01 to 0.26. The image analysis evaluated provides the basis for an alternative approach to deliver very accurate predictions of cuts composition, IMF content and fatty acid profile with lower costs than the reference methods (dissection, chemical analysis), without damaging or depreciating the beef cuts.
使用多元校准方法(偏最小二乘回归,PLSR)研究了 X 射线计算机断层扫描(CT)作为预测牛肉切割成分和肉质特性的潜力。使用螺旋 CT 对 88 头杂交安格斯牛(AAx)和 106 头 Limousin 牛(LIMx)的牛里脊进行了扫描。随后,对其进行了解剖分析,以测定其技术和感官参数以及肌内脂肪(IMF)含量和脂肪酸组成。通过交叉验证测试的 CT-PLSR 校准能够非常准确地预测皮下脂肪(R2,RMSECV=0.94,34.60 g 和 0.92,34.46 g)、肌间脂肪(R2,RMSECV=0.81,161.54 g 和 0.86,42.16 g)、总脂肪(R2,RMSECV=0.89,65.96 g 和 0.93,48.35 g)和肌肉含量(R2,RMSECV=0.99,58.55 g 和 0.97,57.45 g),分别在 AAx 和 LIMx 样品中。在两个父系品种中,准确地预测了脂肪酸谱(R2=0.61-0.75)和肌内脂肪含量(R2=0.71-0.76)。然而,对于技术和感官特性,获得的准确性较低,R2 范围从 0.01 到 0.26。所评估的图像分析为提供替代方法提供了基础,可以以比参考方法(解剖,化学分析)更低的成本,非常准确地预测切割成分、IMF 含量和脂肪酸谱,而不会对牛肉切割造成损坏或贬值。