Segura José, Aalhus Jennifer L, Prieto Nuria, Larsen Ivy L, Juárez Manuel, López-Campos Óscar
Lacombe Research and Development Centre, Agriculture and Agri-Food Canada, Lacombe, AB T4L 1W1, Canada.
Foods. 2021 May 18;10(5):1118. doi: 10.3390/foods10051118.
This study determined the potential of computer vision systems, namely the whole-side carcass camera (HCC) compared to the rib-eye camera (CCC) and dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA) technology to predict primal and carcass composition of cull cows. The predictability (R) of the HCC was similar to the CCC for total fat, but higher for lean (24.0%) and bone (61.6%). Subcutaneous fat (SQ), body cavity fat, and retail cut yield (RCY) estimations showed a difference of 6.2% between both CVS. The total lean meat yield (LMY) estimate was 22.4% better for CCC than for HCC. The combination of HCC and CCC resulted in a similar prediction of total fat, SQ, and intermuscular fat, and improved predictions of total lean and bone compared to HCC/CCC. Furthermore, a 25.3% improvement was observed for LMY and RCY estimations. DXA predictions showed improvements in R values of 26.0% and 25.6% compared to the HCC alone or the HCC + CCC combined, respectively. These results suggest the feasibility of using HCC for predicting primal and carcass composition. This is an important finding for slaughter systems, such as those used for mature cattle in North America that do not routinely knife rib carcasses, which prevents the use of CCC.
本研究确定了计算机视觉系统的潜力,即将全侧胴体摄像头(HCC)与肋眼摄像头(CCC)以及双能X射线吸收法(DXA)技术相比较,以预测淘汰母牛的主要切块和胴体组成。HCC对总脂肪的预测能力(R)与CCC相似,但对瘦肉(24.0%)和骨骼(61.6%)的预测能力更高。皮下脂肪(SQ)、体腔脂肪和零售切块产量(RCY)的估计显示,两种计算机视觉系统之间相差6.2%。CCC对总瘦肉产量(LMY)的估计比HCC高22.4%。HCC和CCC相结合,对总脂肪、SQ和肌间脂肪的预测相似,与HCC/CCC相比,对总瘦肉和骨骼的预测有所改善。此外,LMY和RCY估计值提高了25.3%。与单独使用HCC或HCC + CCC组合相比,DXA预测的R值分别提高了26.0%和25.6%。这些结果表明使用HCC预测主要切块和胴体组成具有可行性。对于屠宰系统而言,这是一项重要发现,例如在北美用于成年牛的屠宰系统,这些系统通常不对肋部胴体进行开刀,这使得CCC无法使用。