Di Alberti Luca, Donnini Federica, Di Alberti Claudio, Camerino Michele
Quintessence Int. 2010 Sep;41(8):639-644.
To date, there have been no studies on the outcome of osseointegration of alveolar bone around dental implants inserted with piezoelectric osteotomy versus conventional osteotomy. The aim of this study was to compare the radiographic differences, through evaluation of peri-implant bone density, between implant insertion using traditional surgical technique and piezoelectric technique.
Forty patients were selected whose treatment consisted of a minimum of two implants placed in nonpathologic native bone. A single type of implant surface (SLA) was chosen. The implants were placed following the manufacturer protocol for traditional surgical technique and piezoelectric technique. Radiographs were taken following surgery and 30, 60, and 90 days after surgery. The bone density was studied with the densitometry application.
All patients completed the study period with success. Despite a limited number of treated patients, the results of this pilot study demonstrated that (1) piezoelectric implant site preparation promotes better bone density and osteogenesis, and (2) the piezoelectric technique is predictable, with a 100% success rate in this study.
迄今为止，尚未有关于采用压电截骨术与传统截骨术植入牙种植体后牙槽骨骨结合结果的研究。本研究的目的是通过评估种植体周围骨密度，比较使用传统手术技术和压电技术植入种植体后的影像学差异。
选择40例患者，其治疗包括在非病理性天然骨中至少植入两颗种植体。选用单一类型的种植体表面（SLA）。按照制造商的传统手术技术和压电技术方案植入种植体。术后以及术后30、60和90天拍摄X线片。使用骨密度测量应用程序研究骨密度。
所有患者均成功完成研究期。尽管治疗患者数量有限，但本初步研究结果表明：（1）压电种植体植入部位制备可促进更好的骨密度和成骨，（2）压电技术具有可预测性，本研究中的成功率为100%。
Zotero 插件