Suppr超能文献

骨环技术在垂直骨量不足的牙槽嵴中应用:单期与两期种植体植入的比较 - 第 2 部分:种植体骨结合。

Single-staged vs. two-staged implant placement in vertically deficient alveolar ridges using bone ring technique - Part 2: implant osseointegration.

机构信息

Advanced Research Center, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Niigata, Japan.

Department of Histology, The Nippon Dental University School of Life Dentistry at Niigata, Niigata, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Oral Implants Res. 2017 Jul;28(7):e31-e38. doi: 10.1111/clr.12851. Epub 2016 Apr 19.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES

The aim of this study was to evaluate the osseointegration of implants placed in a single-staged compared to two-staged procedure using bone ring technique.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

In this study were used standardized, vertical alveolar bone defects in dogs. In the test group, dental implants (Straumann BL , Basel, Switzerland) were inserted simultaneously with bone ring technique. As control group served implants inserted 6 months following grafting. Implants of both groups were left for an osseointegration period of 3 and 6 months. The peri-implant bone loss and bone-to-implant contact within the bone ring and native bone were analyzed morphometrically. An explorative statistical analysis was performed.

RESULTS

The peri-implant bone level remained relatively stable within groups and between groups per given time period. Most of bone apposite on the implant surface in two groups was composed of newly formed bone. A nonparametric analysis of variance (ANOVA) revealed no significant advantage for two-staged implant placement for new and total bone, except for residual bone (P = .0084). Furthermore, two groups of implants performed similarly in bone ring and in native bone throughout the observation period.

CONCLUSIONS

In terms of osseointegration, both techniques are likely equally efficient in the present defect model. The single-staged implant placement with cortical bone grafts warrants further documentation in clinical studies.

摘要

目的

本研究旨在评估使用骨环技术进行单阶段与两阶段手术的种植体骨整合情况。

材料与方法

本研究采用犬的标准化垂直牙槽骨缺损。在实验组中,同时使用骨环技术植入牙科种植体(Straumann BL,巴塞尔,瑞士)。对照组为植入后 6 个月进行移植的种植体。两组种植体均进行 3 个月和 6 个月的骨整合期。通过形态计量学分析评估种植体周围骨丧失和骨与种植体接触情况。进行了探索性统计分析。

结果

在给定的时间段内,各组成员的种植体周围骨水平相对稳定,且组间差异无统计学意义。两组中大多数附着在种植体表面的骨均由新生骨组成。非参数方差分析(ANOVA)显示,除残余骨(P=0.0084)外,两阶段种植体植入术在新骨和总骨方面没有明显优势。此外,在整个观察期间,两组种植体在骨环和原生骨中的表现相似。

结论

就骨整合而言,两种技术在目前的缺损模型中可能同样有效。皮质骨移植的单阶段种植体植入术值得在临床研究中进一步记录。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验