Department of Operative Dentistry, School of Dentistry, University of Guarulhos, SP, Brazil.
Braz Oral Res. 2010 Apr-Jun;24(2):245-9. doi: 10.1590/s1806-83242010000200019.
This study evaluated the Knoop Hardness (KHN) values of two dual-cured composite resin core build-up materials and one resin cement exposed to different curing conditions. Two dual-cured core build-up composite resins (LuxaCore-Dual, DMG; and FluoroCore2, Dentsply Caulk), and one dual-cured resin cement (Rely X ARC, 3M ESPE) were used in the present study. The composite materials were placed into a cylindrical matrix (2 mm in height and 3 mm in diameter), and the specimens thus produced were either light-activated for 40 s (Optilux 501, Demetron Kerr) or were allowed to self-cure for 10 min in the dark (n = 5). All specimens were then stored in humidity at 37 degrees C for 24 h in the dark and were subjected to KHN analysis. The results were submitted to 2-way ANOVA and Tukey's post-hoc test at a pre-set alpha of 5%. All the light-activated groups exhibited higher KHN values than the self-cured ones (p = 0.00001), regardless of product. Among the self-cured groups, both composite resin core build-up materials showed higher KHN values than the dual-cured resin cement (p = 0.00001). LuxaCore-Dual exhibited higher KHN values than FluoroCore2 (p = 0.00001) when they were allowed to self-cure, while no significant differences in KHN values were observed among the light-activated products. The results suggest that dual-cured composite resin core build-up materials may be more reliable than dual-cured resin cements when curing light is not available.
本研究评估了两种双重固化复合树脂核修复材料和一种树脂水门汀在不同固化条件下的 Knoop 硬度(KHN)值。本研究使用了两种双重固化核修复复合树脂(DMG 的 LuxaCore-Dual 和 Dentsply Caulk 的 FluoroCore2)和一种双重固化树脂水门汀(3M ESPE 的 Rely X ARC)。将复合材料放入圆柱形基质中(高 2 毫米,直径 3 毫米),由此产生的试件要么用光激活 40 秒(Demetron Kerr 的 Optilux 501),要么在黑暗中自固化 10 分钟(n=5)。所有试件随后在黑暗中于 37°C 的湿度下储存 24 小时,并进行 KHN 分析。结果提交给 2 因素方差分析和 Tukey 事后检验,设定的 alpha 值为 5%。所有光激活组的 KHN 值均高于自固化组(p=0.00001),与产品无关。在自固化组中,两种复合树脂核修复材料的 KHN 值均高于双重固化树脂水门汀(p=0.00001)。当 LuxaCore-Dual 允许自固化时,其 KHN 值高于 FluoroCore2(p=0.00001),而光激活产品的 KHN 值则没有显著差异。结果表明,在没有固化光的情况下,双重固化复合树脂核修复材料可能比双重固化树脂水门汀更可靠。