Middle Tennessee State University, Murfreesboro, Tennessee, USA.
Arch Suicide Res. 2010;14(3):222-35. doi: 10.1080/13811118.2010.494135.
We examined the cultural validity of the College Student Reasons for Living Inventory (CSRLI) with Asian American College Students (N = 314). Although results did not completely replicate the six factor structure of the CSRLI as identified in Westefeld, Cardin, and Deaton (1992), partial support was found. The content of the five factors that emerged corresponded to five of the original scales. Our factor solution accounted for 50.25% of common variance and demonstrated moderate to high coefficient alphas. Validity of the CSRLI subscales was supported through significant negative relations with measures of depression and hopelessness. Furthermore, the CSRLI subscales accounted for 8% of the variance in suicidal behavior above and beyond that accounted for by the risk factors of depression and hopelessness alone.
我们用亚裔美国大学生(N=314)来检验《大学生生活原因量表》(CSRLI)的文化效度。虽然结果并没有完全复制 Westefeld、Cardin 和 Deaton(1992)提出的 CSRLI 的六因素结构,但还是得到了部分支持。出现的五个因素的内容与原来的五个量表相对应。我们的因素解决方案占共同方差的 50.25%,并表现出中等至高度的系数阿尔法值。CSRLI 分量表的有效性通过与抑郁和绝望的测量值呈显著负相关得到支持。此外,CSRLI 分量表在考虑抑郁和绝望等风险因素之外,还能解释自杀行为 8%的变异。