Department of Pedodontics, Faculty of Dentistry, Kirikkale University, Kirikkale, Turkey.
Int J Paediatr Dent. 2011 Jan;21(1):29-34. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-263X.2010.01076.x.
The aim of this in vitro study was to evaluate the effects of using only phosphoric acid or a self-etch bonding agent under clear and opaque fissure sealants on laser fluorescence (LF) readings and the reproducibility of the laser device.
Eighty extracted permanent molars, ranged from sound to carious, were randomly divided into four groups: phosphoric acid + opaque sealant (group I), Clearfil S3 Bond (Kuraray, Kurashiki, Japan) + opaque sealant (group II), phosphoric acid + clear sealant (group III), and Clearfil S3 Bond + clear sealant (group IV). The teeth were measured using an LFpen device, before and after sealing. Data were analysed using the Spearman's correlation, Wilcoxon signed rank, and Mann-Whitney U-test.
Except group IV, there was a statistically significant decrease in fluorescence after the application of sealants (P < 0.05). The decrease of LFpen readings in the opaque sealant groups was more significant than the clear sealant groups (P < 0.05). But for both sealants, the difference between phosphoric acid and Clearfil S3 Bond groups was nonsignificant (P > 0.05).
There was a statistically significant decrease in fluorescence for both clear and opaque sealant groups. However, clear sealant with Clearfil S3 Bond does not influence the LFpen readings.
本体外研究旨在评估在透明和不透明窝沟封闭剂下仅使用磷酸或自酸蚀粘结剂对激光荧光(LF)读数和激光设备的重复性的影响。
从正常到龋坏的 80 颗离体恒牙随机分为 4 组:磷酸+不透明封闭剂(I 组)、Clearfil S3 Bond(Kuraray,Kurashiki,日本)+不透明封闭剂(II 组)、磷酸+透明封闭剂(III 组)和 Clearfil S3 Bond+透明封闭剂(IV 组)。使用 LFpen 设备在密封前后对牙齿进行测量。使用 Spearman 相关、Wilcoxon 符号秩和和 Mann-Whitney U 检验分析数据。
除 IV 组外,密封后荧光强度均有统计学意义的降低(P<0.05)。不透明封闭剂组 LFpen 读数的降低明显大于透明封闭剂组(P<0.05)。但是对于两种封闭剂,磷酸组和 Clearfil S3 Bond 组之间的差异无统计学意义(P>0.05)。
透明和不透明窝沟封闭剂组的荧光强度均有统计学意义的降低。然而,Clearfil S3 Bond 透明封闭剂不会影响 LFpen 读数。