• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

范畴组合性:人类认知系统性的范畴论解释。

Categorial compositionality: a category theory explanation for the systematicity of human cognition.

机构信息

Mathematical Neuroinformatics Group, Human Technology Research Institute, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tsukuba, Ibaraki, Japan.

出版信息

PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jul 22;6(7):e1000858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000858.

DOI:10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000858
PMID:20661306
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC2908697/
Abstract

Classical and Connectionist theories of cognitive architecture seek to explain systematicity (i.e., the property of human cognition whereby cognitive capacity comes in groups of related behaviours) as a consequence of syntactically and functionally compositional representations, respectively. However, both theories depend on ad hoc assumptions to exclude specific instances of these forms of compositionality (e.g. grammars, networks) that do not account for systematicity. By analogy with the Ptolemaic (i.e. geocentric) theory of planetary motion, although either theory can be made to be consistent with the data, both nonetheless fail to fully explain it. Category theory, a branch of mathematics, provides an alternative explanation based on the formal concept of adjunction, which relates a pair of structure-preserving maps, called functors. A functor generalizes the notion of a map between representational states to include a map between state transformations (or processes). In a formal sense, systematicity is a necessary consequence of a higher-order theory of cognitive architecture, in contrast to the first-order theories derived from Classicism or Connectionism. Category theory offers a re-conceptualization for cognitive science, analogous to the one that Copernicus provided for astronomy, where representational states are no longer the center of the cognitive universe--replaced by the relationships between the maps that transform them.

摘要

经典和连接主义认知架构理论分别试图将系统性(即人类认知的属性,即认知能力来自相关行为的群体)解释为语法和功能组合表示的结果。然而,这两种理论都依赖于特定的假设来排除这些组合形式(例如语法、网络)的特定实例,这些实例无法解释系统性。类比于托勒密(即地心说)行星运动理论,尽管这两种理论都可以与数据一致,但都未能完全解释它。范畴论是数学的一个分支,它提供了一种基于附加形式概念的替代解释,该概念涉及一对保持结构的映射,称为函子。函子将表示状态之间的映射的概念推广到包括状态变换(或过程)之间的映射。从形式意义上讲,与从古典主义或连接主义推导而来的一阶理论相比,认知架构的高阶理论是系统性的必然结果。范畴论为认知科学提供了一种重新概念化的方法,类似于哥白尼为天文学提供的方法,其中表示状态不再是认知宇宙的中心——而是代表它们的映射之间的关系。

相似文献

1
Categorial compositionality: a category theory explanation for the systematicity of human cognition.范畴组合性:人类认知系统性的范畴论解释。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jul 22;6(7):e1000858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000858.
2
Categorial compositionality II: universal constructions and a general theory of (quasi-)systematicity in human cognition.范畴组合性 II:人类认知中的普遍结构和(准)系统性的一般理论。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Aug;7(8):e1002102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002102. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
3
Systematicity and a Categorical Theory of Cognitive Architecture: Universal Construction in Context.系统性与认知架构的范畴理论:情境中的通用建构
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 29;7:1139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01139. eCollection 2016.
4
Second-Order Systematicity of Associative Learning: A Paradox for Classical Compositionality and a Coalgebraic Resolution.联想学习的二阶系统性:经典组合性的一个悖论及余代数解决方案。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 9;11(8):e0160619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160619. eCollection 2016.
5
Analogy, cognitive architecture and universal construction: a tale of two systematicities.类比、认知架构与普遍构建:两个系统性的故事。
PLoS One. 2014 Feb 25;9(2):e89152. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0089152. eCollection 2014.
6
Categorial compositionality III: F-(co)algebras and the systematicity of recursive capacities in human cognition.范畴组合性 III:F-(余)代数与人类认知中的递归能力的系统性。
PLoS One. 2012;7(4):e35028. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0035028. Epub 2012 Apr 13.
7
Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: why Smolensky's solution doesn't work.联结主义与系统性问题:为何斯莫伦斯基的解决方案行不通。
Cognition. 1990 May;35(2):183-204. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90014-b.
8
Sheaving-a universal construction for semantic compositionality.Sheaving—一种通用的语义组合结构。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20190303. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0303. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
9
Connectionist semantic systematicity.联结主义语义系统性
Cognition. 2009 Mar;110(3):358-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.013. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
10
Connectionism and the problem of systematicity (continued): why Smolensky's solution still doesn't work.联结主义与系统性问题(续):为何斯莫伦斯基的解决方案仍然行不通。
Cognition. 1997 Jan;62(1):109-19. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00780-9.

引用本文的文献

1
A category theory perspective on the Language of Thought: LoT is universal.从范畴论角度看思维语言:思维语言具有普遍性。
Front Psychol. 2024 Apr 30;15:1361580. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1361580. eCollection 2024.
2
An adjunction hypothesis between qualia and reports.感受质与报告之间的一种附属假说。
Front Psychol. 2023 Jan 30;13:1053977. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1053977. eCollection 2022.
3
What is category theory to cognitive science? Compositional representation and comparison.范畴论之于认知科学是什么?组合表示与比较。
Front Psychol. 2022 Nov 18;13:1048975. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2022.1048975. eCollection 2022.
4
A relational approach to consciousness: categories of level and contents of consciousness.一种关于意识的关系方法:意识的层次类别与内容
Neurosci Conscious. 2021 Oct 15;2021(2):niab034. doi: 10.1093/nc/niab034. eCollection 2021.
5
Robust unified Granger causality analysis: a normalized maximum likelihood form.稳健统一格兰杰因果关系分析:一种归一化最大似然形式。
Brain Inform. 2021 Aug 6;8(1):15. doi: 10.1186/s40708-021-00136-2.
6
A reconstruction theory of relational schema induction.关系模式归纳的一种重构理论。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2021 Jan 26;17(1):e1008641. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1008641. eCollection 2021 Jan.
7
Sheaving-a universal construction for semantic compositionality.Sheaving—一种通用的语义组合结构。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2020 Feb 3;375(1791):20190303. doi: 10.1098/rstb.2019.0303. Epub 2019 Dec 16.
8
Going Beyond the Data as the Patching (Sheaving) of Local Knowledge.超越作为局部知识拼凑(层化)的数据。
Front Psychol. 2018 Oct 9;9:1926. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01926. eCollection 2018.
9
Modeling Terminologies for Reusability in Faceted Systems.多面分类系统中可复用性的建模术语
Proc IEEE Int Conf Inf Reuse Integr. 2018;561:139-163. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-56157-8_7. Epub 2017 Aug 17.
10
Dual-Routes and the Cost of Determining Least-Costs.双重路径与确定最低成本的代价
Front Psychol. 2017 Nov 7;8:1943. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2017.01943. eCollection 2017.

本文引用的文献

1
What do transitive inference and class inclusion have in common? Categorical (co)products and cognitive development.传递推理和类包含有什么共同之处?范畴(共)产品和认知发展。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2009 Dec;5(12):e1000599. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000599. Epub 2009 Dec 11.
2
Memory binding in early childhood: evidence for a retrieval deficit.儿童早期的记忆绑定:提取缺陷的证据。
Child Dev. 2009 Sep-Oct;80(5):1321-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-8624.2009.01353.x.
3
The discovery of structural form.结构形式的发现
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2008 Aug 5;105(31):10687-92. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0802631105. Epub 2008 Jul 31.
4
Theory-based Bayesian models of inductive learning and reasoning.基于理论的归纳学习与推理贝叶斯模型。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2006 Jul;10(7):309-18. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2006.05.009. Epub 2006 Jun 22.
5
Rethinking eliminative connectionism.重新思考消除式联结主义。
Cogn Psychol. 1998 Dec;37(3):243-82. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0694.
6
Can connectionism save constructivism?联结主义能拯救建构主义吗?
Cognition. 1998 May;66(2):153-82. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(98)00018-3.
7
Induction of relational schemas: common processes in reasoning and complex learning.关系模式的归纳:推理和复杂学习中的共同过程。
Cogn Psychol. 1998 Apr;35(3):201-45. doi: 10.1006/cogp.1998.0679.
8
Connectionism and the problem of systematicity (continued): why Smolensky's solution still doesn't work.联结主义与系统性问题(续):为何斯莫伦斯基的解决方案仍然行不通。
Cognition. 1997 Jan;62(1):109-19. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00780-9.
9
A category theory approach to cognitive development.一种认知发展的范畴论方法。
Cogn Psychol. 1980 Jul;12(3):356-411. doi: 10.1016/0010-0285(80)90014-6.
10
Connectionism and cognitive architecture: a critical analysis.联结主义与认知结构:批判性分析
Cognition. 1988 Mar;28(1-2):3-71. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(88)90031-5.