Suppr超能文献

联结主义与系统性问题(续):为何斯莫伦斯基的解决方案仍然行不通。

Connectionism and the problem of systematicity (continued): why Smolensky's solution still doesn't work.

作者信息

Fodor J

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 1997 Jan;62(1):109-19. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00780-9.

Abstract

Paul Smolensky has recently announced that the problem of explaining the compositionality of concepts within a connectionist framework is solved in principle. Mental representations are vectors over the activity states of connectionist "units", but the vectors encode Classical trees, whose structural properties in turn "acausally" explain the facts of compositionality. This sounds suspiciously like the offer of a free lunch, and it turns out, upon examination, that there is nothing to it.

摘要

保罗·斯莫伦斯基最近宣称,在联结主义框架内解释概念的组合性问题原则上已得到解决。心理表征是联结主义“单元”活动状态上的向量,但这些向量编码经典树状结构,其结构属性反过来又“非因果地”解释了组合性的事实。这听起来可疑地像是天上掉馅饼,而经审视后发现,根本不是那么回事。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验