• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

联结主义与系统性问题(续):为何斯莫伦斯基的解决方案仍然行不通。

Connectionism and the problem of systematicity (continued): why Smolensky's solution still doesn't work.

作者信息

Fodor J

机构信息

Center for Cognitive Science, Rutgers University, Piscataway, NJ 08855, USA.

出版信息

Cognition. 1997 Jan;62(1):109-19. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00780-9.

DOI:10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00780-9
PMID:8997173
Abstract

Paul Smolensky has recently announced that the problem of explaining the compositionality of concepts within a connectionist framework is solved in principle. Mental representations are vectors over the activity states of connectionist "units", but the vectors encode Classical trees, whose structural properties in turn "acausally" explain the facts of compositionality. This sounds suspiciously like the offer of a free lunch, and it turns out, upon examination, that there is nothing to it.

摘要

保罗·斯莫伦斯基最近宣称,在联结主义框架内解释概念的组合性问题原则上已得到解决。心理表征是联结主义“单元”活动状态上的向量,但这些向量编码经典树状结构,其结构属性反过来又“非因果地”解释了组合性的事实。这听起来可疑地像是天上掉馅饼,而经审视后发现,根本不是那么回事。

相似文献

1
Connectionism and the problem of systematicity (continued): why Smolensky's solution still doesn't work.联结主义与系统性问题(续):为何斯莫伦斯基的解决方案仍然行不通。
Cognition. 1997 Jan;62(1):109-19. doi: 10.1016/s0010-0277(96)00780-9.
2
Connectionism and the problem of systematicity: why Smolensky's solution doesn't work.联结主义与系统性问题:为何斯莫伦斯基的解决方案行不通。
Cognition. 1990 May;35(2):183-204. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(90)90014-b.
3
Categorial compositionality: a category theory explanation for the systematicity of human cognition.范畴组合性:人类认知系统性的范畴论解释。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jul 22;6(7):e1000858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000858.
4
Connectionist semantic systematicity.联结主义语义系统性
Cognition. 2009 Mar;110(3):358-79. doi: 10.1016/j.cognition.2008.11.013. Epub 2009 Jan 9.
5
Second-Order Systematicity of Associative Learning: A Paradox for Classical Compositionality and a Coalgebraic Resolution.联想学习的二阶系统性:经典组合性的一个悖论及余代数解决方案。
PLoS One. 2016 Aug 9;11(8):e0160619. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0160619. eCollection 2016.
6
Systematicity and a Categorical Theory of Cognitive Architecture: Universal Construction in Context.系统性与认知架构的范畴理论:情境中的通用建构
Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 29;7:1139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2016.01139. eCollection 2016.
7
Categorial compositionality II: universal constructions and a general theory of (quasi-)systematicity in human cognition.范畴组合性 II:人类认知中的普遍结构和(准)系统性的一般理论。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2011 Aug;7(8):e1002102. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1002102. Epub 2011 Aug 4.
8
What do connectionism and social psychology offer each other?联结主义和社会心理学能相互提供什么?
J Pers Soc Psychol. 1996 May;70(5):893-912. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.70.5.893.
9
Language and connectionism: the developing interface.语言与联结主义:发展中的界面
Cognition. 1994 Apr-Jun;50(1-3):385-401. doi: 10.1016/0010-0277(94)90037-x.
10
Relational frame theory: a post-Skinnerian account of human language and cognition.关系框架理论:对人类语言与认知的斯金纳后时代阐释
Adv Child Dev Behav. 2001;28:101-38. doi: 10.1016/s0065-2407(02)80063-5.

引用本文的文献

1
The computational origin of representation.表征的计算起源。
Minds Mach (Dordr). 2021 Mar;31:1-58. doi: 10.1007/s11023-020-09540-9. Epub 2020 Nov 3.
2
Categorial compositionality: a category theory explanation for the systematicity of human cognition.范畴组合性:人类认知系统性的范畴论解释。
PLoS Comput Biol. 2010 Jul 22;6(7):e1000858. doi: 10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000858.