Suppr超能文献

比较简单法和标准法测定菊粉清除率。

Comparison of a simple and a standard method for inulin renal clearance.

机构信息

Department of Functional Diagnostic Science, Osaka University Graduate School of Medicine, Suita, Osaka, 565-0871, Japan.

出版信息

Clin Exp Nephrol. 2010 Oct;14(5):427-30. doi: 10.1007/s10157-010-0325-9. Epub 2010 Jul 28.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The standard method of renal inulin clearance consists of three sets of 30-min clearances. We previously proposed a simple method with a single urine collection for 1 h and two blood samples. In this study, we compared the two methods.

METHODS

The study involved 112 individuals. Three sets of 30-min urine sample collections were started 45 min after inulin infusion , and serum concentrations were measured at the midpoint (60, 90, 120 min) of each clearance period. The mean of the three (Cin-ST) or average of the first two (Cin-ST2) clearances was used for the standard method. Clearance calculated by the simple method (Cin-S) combined the first two collections and the mean of serum concentrations at the beginning (45 min) and end (105 min) of the clearance period. Clearance was also calculated by estimated area under the plasma concentration curve from 45 to 105 min (Cin-A) as a more reliable value.

RESULTS

Cin-S correlated highly with Cin-ST (r = 0.992). Bland-Altman plot indicated that Cin-S was lower than Cin-ST at the same rate in all glomerular filtration rate (GFR) ranges. Total Cin-S of all patients was significantly lower (5.9%, 4.8%, and 3.6%) than Cin-ST, Cin-ST2, and Cin-A, respectively. Cin-ST2 was 1.3% higher than Cin-A. The change in serum inulin concentration by time from 45 to 105 min was not linear but concave. This led to the underestimation of clearance by the simple method.

CONCLUSION

The simple method of renal inulin clearance gives slightly lower results than the standard method. The difference was small, indicating the simple method is accurate enough for use in clinical practice.

摘要

背景

标准的肾内菊粉清除率方法包括三组 30 分钟的清除率。我们之前提出了一种简单的方法,单次收集 1 小时尿液和两份血样。在这项研究中,我们比较了两种方法。

方法

这项研究涉及 112 个人。三组 30 分钟的尿样收集在菊粉输注后 45 分钟开始,每个清除期的中点(60、90、120 分钟)测量血清浓度。三个平均值(Cin-ST)或前两个平均值(Cin-ST2)用于标准方法。简单方法(Cin-S)计算的清除率结合了前两个收集和清除期开始(45 分钟)和结束(105 分钟)时的血清浓度平均值。还通过从 45 到 105 分钟的血浆浓度曲线估计面积(Cin-A)计算清除率,作为更可靠的值。

结果

Cin-S 与 Cin-ST 高度相关(r=0.992)。Bland-Altman 图表明,在所有肾小球滤过率(GFR)范围内,Cin-S 的下降速度均低于 Cin-ST。所有患者的总 Cin-S 分别显著低于 Cin-ST、Cin-ST2 和 Cin-A(分别为 5.9%、4.8%和 3.6%)。Cin-ST2 比 Cin-A 高 1.3%。从 45 到 105 分钟的血清菊粉浓度随时间的变化不是线性的而是凹形的。这导致简单方法对清除率的低估。

结论

肾内菊粉清除率的简单方法结果略低于标准方法。差异较小,表明简单方法在临床实践中足够准确。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验