Chen Chih-Chung, Johnson Mark I
Faculty of Health, Leeds Metropolitan University, Leeds, West Yorkshire, UK.
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2010 Jul;30(4):260-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2010.00936.x.
Electrophysiological studies suggest that there are differential frequency effects during TENS. The aim of this experimental study was to assess the effects of strong non-painful TENS administered at 3 pulses per second (pps) and 80 pps on cold-pressor pain in healthy human participants. A repeated measure design was used with participants receiving TENS at 3 pps and 80 pps in the same experiment. There were six cold-pressor pain tests conducted on the hand with each type of TENS delivered via four electrodes on the ipsilateral forearm for 20 min. Outcomes were differences in pain threshold (s) and intensity (VAS) after 5 and 15 min of TENS. A 2 x 3 factorial repeated measure ANOVA was performed on data. Thirty-five participants completed the experiment. Statistically significant effects were detected for condition, time and interactions between time x condition for both threshold and intensity. There were statistically higher pain thresholds and lower pain intensities for 3 pps when compared to 80 pps after 5 and 15 min of TENS. The differences after 15 min of TENS were 1.70 s to 3.70 s (95% CI) for threshold and 6.63-15.5 mm (95% CI) for pain intensity. In conclusion, strong non-painful TENS at 3 pps was superior to 80 pps at reducing experimentally induced cold-pressor pain. The implications of these findings are discussed.
电生理研究表明,经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)期间存在不同的频率效应。本实验研究的目的是评估以每秒3次脉冲(pps)和80次脉冲的强度进行的强非痛性经皮电刺激神经疗法对健康人类受试者冷压痛的影响。采用重复测量设计,让参与者在同一实验中接受3次脉冲/秒和80次脉冲/秒的经皮电刺激神经疗法。对手部进行了6次冷压痛测试,每种经皮电刺激神经疗法通过同侧前臂上的四个电极施加20分钟。观察指标为经皮电刺激神经疗法5分钟和15分钟后的疼痛阈值和强度(视觉模拟评分法,VAS)差异。对数据进行2×3析因重复测量方差分析。35名参与者完成了实验。在阈值和强度方面,检测到条件、时间以及时间×条件之间的交互作用具有统计学显著效应。经皮电刺激神经疗法5分钟和15分钟后,与80次脉冲/秒相比,3次脉冲/秒时的疼痛阈值在统计学上更高,疼痛强度更低。经皮电刺激神经疗法15分钟后的差异为,阈值方面为1.70秒至3.70秒(95%置信区间),疼痛强度方面为6.63 - 15.5毫米(95%置信区间)。总之,在减轻实验诱导的冷压痛方面,3次脉冲/秒的强非痛性经皮电刺激神经疗法优于80次脉冲/秒。讨论了这些发现的意义。