• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在健康的人类参与者中,调查当前窗口的大小以及不同频率和身体部位的经皮电神经刺激(TENS)感觉的感知。

An investigation into the magnitude of the current window and perception of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) sensation at various frequencies and body sites in healthy human participants.

机构信息

Faculty of Health and Social Sciences, Leeds Metropolitan University, UK.

出版信息

Clin J Pain. 2013 Feb;29(2):146-53. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182579919.

DOI:10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182579919
PMID:23183261
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Strong nonpainful transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) is prerequisite to a successful analgesic outcome although the ease with which this sensation is achieved is likely to depend on the magnitude of current amplitude (mA) between sensory detection threshold (SDT) and pain threshold, that is, the current window.

OBJECTIVES

To measure the current window and participant's perception of the comfort of the TENS sensation at different body sites.

METHODS

A repeated measure cross-over study was conducted using 30 healthy adult volunteers. Current amplitudes (mA) of TENS [2 pulses per second (pps); 30 pps; 80 pps] at SDT, pain threshold, and strong nonpainful intensities were measured at the tibia (bone), knee joint (connective tissue), lower back [paraspinal (skeletal) muscle], volar surface of forearm (nerve) and waist (fat). The amplitude to achieve a strong nonpainful intensity was represented as a percentage of the current window. Data were analyzed using repeated measures analysis of variance.

RESULTS

Effects were detected for body site and frequency for SDT (P<0.001, P=0.018, respectively), current window (P<0.001, P<0.001, respectively), and strong nonpainful TENS as a percentage of the current window (P=0.002, P<0.001, respectively). The current window was larger for the knee joint compared with tibia (difference [95% confidence interval]=12.76 mA [4.25, 21.28]; P=0.001) and forearm (10.33 mA [2.62, 18.40]; P=0.006), and for the lower back compared with tibia (12.10 mA [1.65, 22.52]; P=0.015) and forearm (9.65 mA [1.06, 18.24]; P=0.019). The current window was larger for 2 pps compared with 30 pps (P<0.001) and 80 pps (P<0.001). Participants rated strong nonpainful TENS as most comfortable at the lower back (P<0.001) and least comfortable at the tibia and forearm (P<0.001).

CONCLUSIONS

TENS is most comfortable and easiest to titrate to a strong nonpainful intensity when applied over areas of muscle and soft tissue.

摘要

简介

虽然实现这种感觉的容易程度可能取决于感觉检测阈值(SDT)和疼痛阈值之间的电流幅度(mA),即电流窗口,但强烈无痛的经皮神经电刺激(TENS)是成功镇痛效果的前提。

目的

测量不同身体部位的 TENS 感觉舒适度的电流窗口和参与者的感知。

方法

采用 30 名健康成年志愿者的重复测量交叉研究。在胫骨(骨)、膝关节(结缔组织)、下背部[脊柱旁(骨骼)肌肉]、前臂掌侧(神经)和腰部(脂肪)处测量 TENS 的电流幅度(mA)[2 脉冲/秒(pps);30pps;80pps]在 SDT、疼痛阈值和强烈无痛强度下。达到强烈无痛强度的幅度表示为电流窗口的百分比。使用重复测量方差分析对数据进行分析。

结果

身体部位和频率对 SDT 有影响(P<0.001,P=0.018),电流窗口(P<0.001,P<0.001),以及 TENS 作为电流窗口的百分比(P=0.002,P<0.001)。与胫骨(差异[95%置信区间]=12.76 mA [4.25,21.28];P=0.001)和前臂(10.33 mA [2.62,18.40];P=0.006)相比,膝关节的电流窗口更大,与胫骨(12.10 mA [1.65,22.52];P=0.015)和前臂(9.65 mA [1.06,18.24];P=0.019)相比,下背部的电流窗口更大。与 30pps(P<0.001)和 80pps(P<0.001)相比,2pps 的电流窗口更大。参与者认为强烈无痛的 TENS 在腰部最舒适(P<0.001),在胫骨和前臂最不舒服(P<0.001)。

结论

当应用于肌肉和软组织区域时,TENS 最舒适,最容易调节至强烈无痛强度。

相似文献

1
An investigation into the magnitude of the current window and perception of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) sensation at various frequencies and body sites in healthy human participants.在健康的人类参与者中,调查当前窗口的大小以及不同频率和身体部位的经皮电神经刺激(TENS)感觉的感知。
Clin J Pain. 2013 Feb;29(2):146-53. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3182579919.
2
An investigation into the hypoalgesic effects of high- and low-frequency transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on experimentally-induced blunt pressure pain in healthy human participants.一项关于高频和低频经皮电神经刺激(TENS)对健康人体实验性钝压疼痛的镇痛作用的研究。
J Pain. 2010 Jan;11(1):53-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.05.008. Epub 2009 Aug 8.
3
An investigation into the effects of frequency-modulated transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) on experimentally-induced pressure pain in healthy human participants.调频经皮电神经刺激(TENS)对健康人体实验性压力痛的影响研究。
J Pain. 2009 Oct;10(10):1029-37. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2009.03.008.
4
Differential frequency effects of strong nonpainful transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on experimentally induced ischemic pain in healthy human participants.强无痛经皮电神经刺激对健康人体实验性缺血性疼痛的频差效应。
Clin J Pain. 2011 Jun;27(5):434-41. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e318208c926.
5
Hypoalgesia in response to transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) depends on stimulation intensity.经皮电神经刺激(TENS)的镇痛作用取决于刺激强度。
J Pain. 2011 Aug;12(8):929-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2011.02.352. Epub 2011 Apr 9.
6
A comparison of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) at 3 and 80 pulses per second on cold-pressor pain in healthy human participants.对健康人类受试者进行经皮电神经刺激(TENS),比较每秒3次脉冲和80次脉冲时对冷压痛的影响。
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2010 Jul;30(4):260-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2010.00936.x.
7
Adjusting pulse amplitude during transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) application produces greater hypoalgesia.调整经皮电神经刺激(TENS)应用中的脉冲幅度会产生更大的镇痛效果。
J Pain. 2011 May;12(5):581-90. doi: 10.1016/j.jpain.2010.11.001. Epub 2011 Feb 1.
8
Effects of intensity of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) on pressure pain threshold and blood pressure in healthy humans: A randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial.经皮神经电刺激(TENS)强度对健康人体的压痛阈值和血压的影响:一项随机、双盲、安慰剂对照试验。
Clin J Pain. 2009 Nov-Dec;25(9):773-80. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0b013e3181a7ece3.
9
Is mechanical pain threshold after transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation (TENS) increased locally and unilaterally? A randomized placebo-controlled trial in healthy subjects.经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)后机械性疼痛阈值是否会局部且单侧提高?一项针对健康受试者的随机安慰剂对照试验。
Physiother Res Int. 2007 Dec;12(4):251-63. doi: 10.1002/pri.384.
10
Conventional versus acupuncture-like transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation on cold-induced pain in healthy human participants: effects during stimulation.传统经皮电刺激神经疗法与类针刺经皮电刺激神经疗法对健康受试者冷诱导疼痛的影响:刺激期间的效果
Clin Physiol Funct Imaging. 2011 Sep;31(5):363-70. doi: 10.1111/j.1475-097X.2011.01025.x. Epub 2011 Apr 18.

引用本文的文献

1
Wearable non-invasive neuroprosthesis for targeted sensory restoration in neuropathy.用于神经病变中靶向感觉恢复的可穿戴无创神经假体。
Nat Commun. 2024 Dec 30;15(1):10840. doi: 10.1038/s41467-024-55152-7.
2
Effectiveness of Hybrid Form Impulse Therapy (HFIT) Compared to Traditional Transcutaneous Electronic Nerve Stimulation (TENS) in Patients with Chronic Low Back and Knee Pain: A Randomized Controlled Trial.混合形式脉冲疗法(HFIT)与传统经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)治疗慢性腰腿痛和膝关节痛患者的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验
J Pain Res. 2024 Jul 19;17:2417-2430. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S461343. eCollection 2024.
3
High-Frequency Impulse Therapy for Treatment of Chronic Back Pain: A Multicenter Randomized Controlled Pilot Study.
高频脉冲疗法治疗慢性背痛:一项多中心随机对照试验研究
J Pain Res. 2021 Sep 22;14:2991-2999. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S325230. eCollection 2021.
4
Resolving Long-Standing Uncertainty about the Clinical Efficacy of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation (TENS) to Relieve Pain: A Comprehensive Review of Factors Influencing Outcome.解决关于经皮电刺激神经疗法(TENS)缓解疼痛的临床疗效的长期不确定性:对影响结果的因素的全面综述
Medicina (Kaunas). 2021 Apr 14;57(4):378. doi: 10.3390/medicina57040378.
5
No Influence of Transcutaneous Electrical Nerve Stimulation on Exercise-Induced Pain and 5-Km Cycling Time-Trial Performance.经皮电神经刺激对运动诱发疼痛和5公里自行车计时赛成绩无影响。
Front Physiol. 2017 Feb 7;8:26. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2017.00026. eCollection 2017.
6
Skin impedance is not a factor in transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation effectiveness.皮肤阻抗并非经皮电神经刺激有效性的一个影响因素。
J Pain Res. 2015 Aug 19;8:571-80. doi: 10.2147/JPR.S86577. eCollection 2015.
7
Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation as adjunct to primary care management for tennis elbow: pragmatic randomised controlled trial (TATE trial).经皮神经电刺激作为网球肘初级保健管理的辅助手段:实用随机对照试验 (TATE 试验)。
BMJ. 2013 Sep 2;347:f5160. doi: 10.1136/bmj.f5160.