Curatio International Foundation, 37 d Chavchavadze ave, Tbilisi, Georgia.
BMC Public Health. 2010 Jul 27;10:440. doi: 10.1186/1471-2458-10-440.
Public health services in the Soviet Union and its satellite states in Central and Eastern Europe were delivered through centrally planned and managed networks of sanitary-epidemiological (san-epid) facilities. Many countries sought to reform this service following the political transition in the 1990s. In this paper we describe the major themes within these reforms.
A review of literature was conducted. A conceptual framework was developed to guide the review, which focused on the two traditional core public health functions of the san-epid system: communicable disease surveillance, prevention and control and environmental health. The review included twenty-two former communist countries in the former Soviet Union (fSU) and in Central and Eastern Europe (CEE).
The countries studied fall into two broad groups. Reforms were more extensive in the CEE countries than in the fSU. The CEE countries have moved away from the former centrally managed san-epid system, adopting a variety of models of decentralization. The reformed systems remain mainly funded centrally level, but in some countries there are contributions by local government. In almost all countries, epidemiological surveillance and environmental monitoring remained together under a single organizational umbrella but in a few responsibilities for environmental health have been divided among different ministries.
Progress in reform of public health services has varied considerably. There is considerable scope to learn from the differing experiences but also a need for rigorous evaluation of how public health functions are provided.
苏联及其在中东欧的卫星国的公共卫生服务是通过中央计划和管理的卫生防疫(san-epid)设施网络提供的。许多国家在 20 世纪 90 年代的政治转型后试图改革这项服务。本文描述了这些改革中的主要主题。
对文献进行了回顾。制定了一个概念框架来指导审查,重点是 san-epid 系统的两个传统核心公共卫生功能:传染病监测、预防和控制以及环境卫生。审查包括前苏联(fSU)和中东欧(CEE)的 22 个前共产主义国家。
所研究的国家分为两类。CEE 国家的改革比 fSU 国家更为广泛。CEE 国家已经摆脱了以前中央管理的 san-epid 系统,采用了各种权力下放模式。改革后的系统仍然主要由中央一级供资,但在一些国家,地方政府也有贡献。在几乎所有国家,流行病学监测和环境监测仍然在一个单一的组织伞下,但在少数几个国家,环境卫生的责任已经分配给不同的部门。
公共卫生服务改革的进展差异很大。有很大的空间可以从不同的经验中学习,但也需要严格评估公共卫生职能的提供情况。