Suppr超能文献

两种牙髓提取方法用于遗传指纹图谱分析的比较研究。

A comparative study of two methods of dental pulp extraction for genetic fingerprinting.

机构信息

Université Paris Descartes, Laboratoire d'Anatomie Fonctionnelle, 1, rue Maurice Arnoux, 92120 Montrouge, France.

出版信息

Forensic Sci Int. 2010 Oct 10;202(1-3):e39-43. doi: 10.1016/j.forsciint.2010.06.019.

Abstract

Extracting dental DNA for identification purposes is usually performed after crushing the tooth. The main disadvantage of this method is that the tooth is completely destroyed so further radiographic, anatomical or biochemical studies are no longer possible. We compared the quantities of DNA obtained by crushing the tooth and by removing pulp by standard endodontic access with trepanation of the occlusal surface and amplified DNA micro-satellites. In the series of crushed teeth, insufficient material for amplification was obtained in 78% of cases and a complete profile was obtained in only 9% of cases. Conversely, for the teeth prepared by trepanation, the profile was complete in 75% of cases and the DNA quantity was insufficient in only 3% of cases. Trepanation thus produced superior results in terms of quantity of DNA and the quality of the genetic profiles. Furthermore, it was a conservative procedure that allowed further analyses on the tooth.

摘要

提取用于身份识别的口腔 DNA 通常在粉碎牙齿后进行。这种方法的主要缺点是牙齿被完全破坏,因此进一步的放射学、解剖学或生物化学研究不再可能。我们比较了通过粉碎牙齿和通过标准牙髓进入去除牙髓并用牙钻在咬合面穿孔来获得的 DNA 微卫星的数量。在粉碎牙齿的系列中,78%的情况下获得的扩增材料不足,只有 9%的情况下获得完整的图谱。相反,对于通过牙钻制备的牙齿,75%的情况下图谱完整,只有 3%的情况下 DNA 数量不足。因此,牙钻在 DNA 数量和遗传图谱质量方面产生了更好的结果。此外,它还是一种保守的程序,允许对牙齿进行进一步的分析。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验