Matta Christina
Technical Communication Program, University of Wisconsin-Madison, M1036J Engineering Centers Building, 1550 Engineering Drive, Madison, WI 53706, USA.
J Hist Biol. 2010 Fall;43(3):459-91. doi: 10.1007/s10739-009-9220-1.
Anton de Bary is best known for his elucidation of the life cycle of Phytopthora infestans, the causal organism of late blight of potato and the crop losses that caused famine in nineteenth-century Europe. But while practitioner histories often claim this accomplishment as a founding moment of modern plant pathology, closer examination of de Bary's experiments and his published work suggest that his primary motiviation for pursing this research was based in developmental biology, not agriculture. De Bary shied away from making any recommendations for agricultural practice, and instead focused nearly exclusively on spontaneous generation and fungal development - both concepts promoted through prize questions posted by the Académie des Sciences in the 1850s and 1860s. De Bary's submission to the Académie's 1859 Alhumbert prize question illustrates his own contributions to debates about spontaneous generation and demonstrates the practical applications of seemingly philosophical questions - such as the origin of life.
安东·德·巴里最为人所知的是他阐明了致病疫霉的生命周期,致病疫霉是马铃薯晚疫病的病原体,这种病害导致了19世纪欧洲的作物歉收和饥荒。虽然从业者的历史常常将这一成就视为现代植物病理学的奠基时刻,但仔细审视德·巴里的实验和他发表的作品会发现,他进行这项研究的主要动机基于发育生物学,而非农业。德·巴里回避对农业实践提出任何建议,而是几乎完全专注于自然发生和真菌发育——这两个概念都是通过19世纪50年代和60年代法国科学院提出的有奖问题而得到推动的。德·巴里提交给科学院1859年阿尔洪贝尔奖问题的论文,展示了他对自然发生辩论的贡献,并证明了看似哲学性问题(如生命起源)的实际应用。