Miller Ian
Centre for the History of Medicine in Ireland, School of History and Archives, University College Dublin, Belfield, Dublin 4, Ireland.
Med Hist. 2012 Oct;56(4):444-62. doi: 10.1017/mdh.2012.27.
The activities of Irish medical practitioners in relieving the impact of the Irish Famine (c.1845-52) have been well documented. However, analysis of the function of contemporary medico-scientific ideas relating to food has remained mostly absent from Famine historiography. This is surprising, given the burgeoning influence of Liebigian chemistry and the rising social prominence of nutritional science in the 1840s. Within this article, I argue that the Famine opened up avenues for advocates of the social value of nutritional science to engage with politico-economic discussion regarding Irish dietary, social and economic transformation. Nutritional science was prominent within the activities of the Scientific Commission, the Central Board of Health and in debates regarding soup kitchen schemes. However, the practical inefficacy of many scientific suggestions resulted in public associations being forged between nutritional science and the inefficiencies of state relief policy, whilst emergent tensions between the state, science and the public encouraged scientists in Ireland to gradually distance themselves from state-sponsored relief practices.
爱尔兰医生在缓解爱尔兰饥荒(约1845年至1852年)影响方面的活动已有详尽记载。然而,饥荒史学大多未对当代与食物相关的医学科学观念的作用进行分析。鉴于19世纪40年代李比希化学的影响力不断扩大以及营养科学在社会上的地位日益凸显,这一点令人惊讶。在本文中,我认为饥荒为营养科学社会价值的倡导者开辟了途径,使其能够参与有关爱尔兰饮食、社会和经济转型的政治经济讨论。营养科学在科学委员会、中央卫生委员会的活动以及关于施粥计划的辩论中颇为突出。然而,许多科学建议在实际中缺乏成效,导致营养科学与国家救济政策的低效之间形成了公众关联,而国家、科学与公众之间新出现的紧张关系促使爱尔兰的科学家逐渐与国家支持的救济做法保持距离。