• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

评估应对资源和自尊作为创伤性脑损伤后威胁评估与活动回避之间关系的调节变量。

Evaluation of coping resources and self-esteem as moderators of the relationship between threat appraisals and avoidance of activities after traumatic brain injury.

机构信息

School of Psychology, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010 Dec;20(6):869-82. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2010.503041. Epub 2010 Jul 1.

DOI:10.1080/09602011.2010.503041
PMID:20665337
Abstract

It is not uncommon for people after a traumatic brain injury (TBI) to develop anxieties about possible negative outcomes (i.e., threat appraisals) in relation to participating in valued activities. Some respond to this anxiety by avoiding the activities, but others maintain their participation. The present study investigated two factors that may help explain this variation across individuals in their response to threat appraisals - self-esteem and the evaluation of coping resources. Forty-one individuals with a TBI completed the Avoidance and Threat Appraisals Questionnaire, the Rosenberg Self-Esteem Scale and the Coping Resources Questionnaire. The study's hypotheses were supported: Those low in self-esteem, and those with a negative evaluation of their ability to cope with the TBI, were significantly more likely to respond to threat appraisals with avoidance. Those whose injury was more recent and those whose injury was the result of an assault were also more likely to respond with avoidance. The theoretical and therapeutic implications of these results are discussed.

摘要

颅脑损伤(TBI)后的人通常会对参与有价值的活动可能产生的负面后果(即威胁评估)感到焦虑。有些人会通过避免这些活动来应对这种焦虑,但也有些人会继续参与。本研究调查了两个因素,它们可能有助于解释个体对威胁评估的反应的变化——自尊和应对资源的评估。41 名 TBI 患者完成了回避和威胁评估问卷、罗森伯格自尊量表和应对资源问卷。研究假设得到了支持:那些自尊心较低,以及那些对自己应对 TBI 的能力评价较低的人,更有可能用回避来应对威胁评估。那些受伤时间较短的人,以及那些因受到攻击而受伤的人,也更有可能用回避来应对。讨论了这些结果的理论和治疗意义。

相似文献

1
Evaluation of coping resources and self-esteem as moderators of the relationship between threat appraisals and avoidance of activities after traumatic brain injury.评估应对资源和自尊作为创伤性脑损伤后威胁评估与活动回避之间关系的调节变量。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2010 Dec;20(6):869-82. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2010.503041. Epub 2010 Jul 1.
2
Threat appraisal and avoidance after traumatic brain injury: why and how often are activities avoided?创伤性脑损伤后的威胁评估与回避:为何以及多频繁地回避活动?
Brain Inj. 2004 Sep;18(9):871-88. doi: 10.1080/02699050410001671829.
3
Planful versus avoidant coping: behavior of individuals with moderate-to-severe traumatic brain injury during a psychosocial stress test.计划性应对与回避性应对:中重度创伤性脑损伤个体在心理社会应激测试中的行为表现。
J Int Neuropsychol Soc. 2011 Mar;17(2):248-55. doi: 10.1017/S1355617710001499. Epub 2010 Dec 21.
4
Identity, grief and self-awareness after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后的身份认同、悲伤和自我意识。
Neuropsychol Rehabil. 2011 Jun;21(3):289-305. doi: 10.1080/09602011.2011.555972. Epub 2011 Mar 3.
5
Self-concept and self-esteem after acquired brain injury: a control group comparison.获得性脑损伤后的自我概念与自尊:对照组比较
Brain Inj. 2014;28(2):146-54. doi: 10.3109/02699052.2013.859733.
6
Factors associated with sexuality following traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后与性行为相关的因素。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013 May-Jun;28(3):195-201. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e31828b4f7b.
7
[Multidimensional assessment of coping: validation of the Brief COPE among French population].应对方式的多维评估:法国人群中简易应对方式问卷(Brief COPE)的效度验证
Encephale. 2003 Nov-Dec;29(6):507-18.
8
Alexithymia and avoidance coping following traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后的述情障碍和回避应对。
J Head Trauma Rehabil. 2013 Mar-Apr;28(2):98-105. doi: 10.1097/HTR.0b013e3182426029.
9
Caregiving appraisal after traumatic brain injury: The effects of functional status, coping style, social support and family functioning.创伤性脑损伤后的照护评估:功能状态、应对方式、社会支持及家庭功能的影响
NeuroRehabilitation. 2007;22(1):43-52.
10
Stereotype threat spillover: how coping with threats to social identity affects aggression, eating, decision making, and attention.刻板印象威胁溢出:应对社会认同威胁如何影响攻击行为、饮食、决策和注意力。
J Pers Soc Psychol. 2010 Sep;99(3):467-81. doi: 10.1037/a0018951.

引用本文的文献

1
Perceived neighborhood crime and gun carrying behavior: examining the role of a history of traumatic brain injury.感知到的邻里犯罪与持枪行为:探究创伤性脑损伤病史的作用。
Inj Epidemiol. 2025 Jun 17;12(1):34. doi: 10.1186/s40621-025-00588-8.
2
The relationship between attention and avoidance coping in anorexia nervosa: functional magnetic resonance imaging study.神经性厌食症中注意力与回避应对之间的关系:功能磁共振成像研究
BJPsych Open. 2021 Jul 13;7(4):e130. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2021.963.
3
German validation of Quality of Life after Brain Injury (QOLIBRI) assessment and associated factors.
脑损伤后生活质量(QOLIBRI)评估及相关因素的德国验证
PLoS One. 2017 May 24;12(5):e0176668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0176668. eCollection 2017.
4
A multidimensional approach to apathy after traumatic brain injury.创伤性脑损伤后淡漠的多维方法。
Neuropsychol Rev. 2013 Sep;23(3):210-33. doi: 10.1007/s11065-013-9236-3. Epub 2013 Aug 7.