Karcher Michael J, Herrera Carla, Hansen Keoki
University of Texas at San Antonio.
New Dir Youth Dev. 2010 Summer;2010(126):51-69. doi: 10.1002/yd.349.
Whether relational or goal-directed interactions are most useful in youth mentoring has been frequently debated, but until recently, little work had been done to understand how such interactions manifest to create viable relationship styles. The authors' findings in the first study they explore in this article support Karcher and Nakkula's assertion that relational and goal-directed interactions are distinct. The authors found that both made significant contributions to relationship quality, but for children and preadolescents, relational interactions appeared to be more strongly associated with the quality of the mentoring relationship than did goal-oriented interactions. Karcher and Nakkula further suggest that it is when the focus of interactions (relational and goal-directed) emerges through collaborative dialogue that the strongest relationship styles emerge. In their second study, the authors found that cross-age peer mentoring (school-based) matches that selected their activities collaboratively had higher-quality mentoring relationships (mentor and youth reported) than those matches whose activities were typically selected unilaterally by either the program or the mentee alone.
在青少年指导中,关系导向型互动还是目标导向型互动最为有用,这一问题一直备受争议,但直到最近,对于这些互动如何展现以形成可行的关系模式,人们几乎没有开展过研究。作者在本文所探讨的第一项研究中的发现支持了卡彻尔和纳库拉的观点,即关系导向型互动和目标导向型互动是不同的。作者发现,二者都对关系质量有显著贡献,但对于儿童和青少年前期的孩子来说,相较于目标导向型互动,关系导向型互动似乎与指导关系的质量联系更为紧密。卡彻尔和纳库拉进一步指出,当互动(关系导向型和目标导向型)的重点通过合作对话显现出来时,最强有力的关系模式便会出现。在他们的第二项研究中,作者发现,通过合作选择活动的跨年龄同伴指导(基于学校)配对,其指导关系质量(导师和青少年报告)高于那些活动通常由项目方或被指导者单方面选择的配对。