Suppr超能文献

寻找最佳契合点:调查基于学校的辅导中关系亲密程度和工具性活动的影响。

Finding the Sweet Spot: Investigating the Effects of Relationship Closeness and Instrumental Activities in School-based Mentoring.

机构信息

Department of Human Services, University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA, USA.

Department of Psychology, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

出版信息

Am J Community Psychol. 2019 Mar;63(1-2):88-98. doi: 10.1002/ajcp.12283. Epub 2018 Dec 12.

Abstract

School-based mentoring programs are popular prevention programs thought to influence youth development; but rigorous evaluations indicate that these programs often have small effects on youth outcomes. Researchers suggest that these findings may be explained by (a) mentors and mentees failing to develop a close relationship and (b) mentors not setting goals or focusing on specific skills necessary improve outcomes. We assessed these explanations using data from approximately 1360 mentor and mentee pairs collected through a national study of school-based mentoring (called, "The Student Mentoring Program"). Specifically, we tested the influence of mentee-reported relationship quality and mentor-reported use of goal-setting and feedback-oriented activities on academic, behavioral, and social-emotional outcomes. Results suggested that youth reported relationship quality was associated with small to medium effects on outcomes. Moreover, goal-setting and feedback-oriented activities were associated with moderate to large effects on outcomes. We also found significant interactions between relationship quality and goal-setting and feedback-oriented activities on youth outcomes. We conclude that there appears to be a "sweet-spot" wherein youth outcomes are maximized. The results of this study suggest a need for school-based mentoring programs to monitor and support mentors in developing a close relationship while also providing opportunities to set goals and receive feedback.

摘要

学校辅导计划是一种流行的预防计划,被认为会影响青年的发展;但严格的评估表明,这些计划通常对青年的结果影响很小。研究人员认为,这些发现可能可以用以下两个原因来解释:(a)导师和被辅导者未能建立亲密关系;(b)导师没有设定目标或关注改善结果所需的特定技能。我们使用通过全国学校辅导研究(称为“学生辅导计划”)收集的大约 1360 对导师和被辅导者的数据来评估这些解释。具体来说,我们测试了被辅导者报告的关系质量以及导师报告的目标设定和反馈导向活动对学业、行为和社会情感结果的影响。结果表明,青年报告的关系质量与结果呈中等至中等偏上的相关性。此外,目标设定和反馈导向活动与结果呈中等至大的相关性。我们还发现关系质量和目标设定与反馈导向活动对青年结果的显著交互作用。我们的结论是,似乎存在一个“最佳点”,在这个点上,青年的结果得到了最大化。这项研究的结果表明,学校辅导计划需要监测和支持导师建立亲密关系,同时提供设定目标和获得反馈的机会。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/6fa5/6590442/b957385ea0f6/AJCP-63-88-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验