Molero Alonso Fernando, Recio Saboya Patricia, Cuadrado Guirado Isabel
Facultad de Psicología, Universidad Nacional de Educación a Distancia, Madrid, Spain.
Psicothema. 2010 Aug;22(3):495-501.
The Multifactor Leadership Questionnaire (MLQ) has been one of the most commonly used instruments to assess leadership in organizational settings for the last two decades. However, the factor structure proposed by the MLQ authors has received some criticism. The aim of this work is to examine the fit indices of several alternative factor models suggested by the literature. In order to accomplish this objective, we conducted confirmatory factor analyses in a sample of 954 participants using a Spanish version of the MLQ. Results show that the model that produces the better fit with the data consists of four factors: transformational leadership, developmental/transactional leadership, corrective leadership and avoidant/passive leadership. This model is parsimonious and consistent with the MLQ literature.
在过去二十年中,多因素领导问卷(MLQ)一直是组织环境中评估领导力最常用的工具之一。然而,MLQ作者提出的因素结构受到了一些批评。这项工作的目的是检验文献中提出的几种替代因素模型的拟合指数。为了实现这一目标,我们使用MLQ的西班牙语版本对954名参与者进行了验证性因素分析。结果表明,与数据拟合度最佳的模型由四个因素组成:变革型领导、发展型/交易型领导、纠正型领导和回避型/被动型领导。该模型简洁明了,与MLQ文献一致。