Institute of Neuroscience and School of Psychology, Trinity College, Dublin 2, Ireland.
Hum Brain Mapp. 2011 Jul;32(7):1067-80. doi: 10.1002/hbm.21091. Epub 2010 Jul 28.
The neural mechanisms behind active and passive touch are not yet fully understood. Using fMRI we investigated the brain correlates of these exploratory procedures using a roughness categorization task. Participants either actively explored a surface (active touch) or the surface was moved under the participant's stationary finger (passive touch). The stimuli consisted of three different grades of sandpaper which participants were required to categorize as either coarse, medium, or fine. Exploratory procedure did not affect performance although the coarse and fine surfaces were more easily categorized than the medium surface. An initial whole brain analysis revealed activation of sensory and cognitive areas, including post-central gyrus and prefrontal cortical areas, in line with areas reported in previous studies. Our main analysis revealed greater activation during active than passive touch in the contralateral primary somatosensory region but no effect of stimulus roughness. In contrast, activation in the parietal operculum (OP) was significantly affected by stimulus roughness but not by exploration procedure. Active touch also elicited greater and more distributed brain activity compared with passive touch in areas outside the somatosensory region, possibly due to the motor component of the task. Our results reveal that different cortical areas may be involved in the processing of surface exploration and surface texture, with exploration procedures affecting activations in the primary somatosensory cortex and stimulus properties affecting relatively higher cortical areas within the somatosensory system.
主动触觉和被动触觉背后的神经机制尚未完全被理解。本研究使用 fMRI,通过粗糙度分类任务,研究了这些探索性程序的大脑相关性。参与者可以主动探索表面(主动触觉),也可以让表面在参与者静止的手指下移动(被动触觉)。刺激物由三种不同等级的砂纸组成,要求参与者将其归类为粗、中、细。尽管粗糙和精细的表面比中等表面更容易分类,但探索过程并没有影响表现。最初的全脑分析显示,与之前的研究报告一致,激活了感觉和认知区域,包括中央后回和前额皮质区域。我们的主要分析显示,主动触摸比被动触摸在对侧初级体感区域中引起更大的激活,但刺激粗糙度没有影响。相比之下,顶叶脑岛(OP)的激活受到刺激粗糙度的显著影响,但不受探索过程的影响。与被动触摸相比,主动触摸在体感区域外的其他区域引起更大且更分散的大脑活动,这可能是由于任务的运动成分。我们的结果表明,不同的皮质区域可能参与了表面探索和表面纹理的处理,探索过程影响初级体感皮层的激活,而刺激特性影响体感系统内的相对较高的皮质区域。