Department of Neurology, Gui de Chauliac Hospital, Montpellier 34295, France.
Mov Disord. 2010 Nov 15;25(15):2634-40. doi: 10.1002/mds.23326.
The dopamine system is implicated in reward-based decision making with explicit information (decision making under risk) and implicit probabilities (decision making under ambiguity). Although the pathophysiology of restless legs syndrome (RLS) is not yet fully understood, the genetic factors, iron status, and dopaminergic system are thought to play a role. RLS provides an opportunity to test the dopaminergic hypothesis in a drug-free population and to characterize reward processing using decision-making paradigms. We investigated impulsivity, impulse control disorders, and decision making in 50 untreated patients with primary RLS compared with 60 sex- and age-matched normal controls using one night of polysomnography recording, a structured psychiatric interview, and questionnaires (RLS Severity Scale, Beck Depression Inventory, and Urgency Premeditation Perseverance Impulsive Behavior Scale). Subjects performed the Iowa Gambling Task to assess decision making under ambiguity and the Game of Dice Task to assess decision making under risk. Patients with RLS showed selective changes in decision making on the Iowa Gambling Task and normal decision making on the Game of Dice Task compared with controls. Patients with RLS had greater depressive symptoms than controls, but no difference was found in impulsivity, impulse control disorders, or addictive behaviors. Clinical and polysomnographic variables were unrelated to decision-making performance. Results indicate reduced decision-making performance under ambiguity in drug-free patients with RLS. From a clinical perspective, when using dopaminergic medication to treat RLS, patients with abnormal baseline behaviors should be closely monitored.
多巴胺系统参与基于奖励的决策,包括明确信息(风险决策)和隐含概率(模糊决策)。尽管不宁腿综合征(RLS)的病理生理学尚未完全了解,但遗传因素、铁状态和多巴胺系统被认为发挥作用。RLS 为在无药物人群中测试多巴胺假说以及使用决策制定范式来描述奖励处理提供了机会。我们使用一夜多导睡眠图记录、结构化精神病学访谈和问卷(RLS 严重程度量表、贝克抑郁量表和紧迫性预测坚持冲动行为量表),对 50 名未经治疗的原发性 RLS 患者和 60 名性别和年龄匹配的正常对照进行了冲动性、冲动控制障碍和决策制定研究。受试者进行了爱荷华赌博任务以评估模糊决策下的决策制定,以及骰子游戏任务以评估风险决策下的决策制定。与对照组相比,RLS 患者在爱荷华赌博任务中表现出选择性的决策制定变化,而在骰子游戏任务中表现出正常的决策制定。RLS 患者的抑郁症状比对照组更严重,但在冲动性、冲动控制障碍或成瘾行为方面没有差异。临床和多导睡眠图变量与决策表现无关。结果表明,无药物治疗的 RLS 患者在模糊决策下的决策表现下降。从临床角度来看,当使用多巴胺能药物治疗 RLS 时,基线行为异常的患者应密切监测。