Lustyk M Kathleen B, Chawla Neharika, Nolan Roger S, Marlatt G Alan
School of Psychology, Seattle Pacific University, Washington, USA.
Adv Mind Body Med. 2009 Spring;24(1):20-30.
Increasing interest in mindfulness meditation (MM) warrants discussion of research safety. Side effects of meditation with possible adverse reactions are reported in the literature. Yet participant screening procedures, research safety guidelines, and standards for researcher training have not been developed and disseminated in the MM field of study. The goal of this paper is to summarize safety concerns of MM practice and offer scholars some practical tools to use in their research. For example, we offer screener schematics aimed at determining the contraindication status of potential research participants. Moreover, we provide information on numerous MM training options. Ours is the first presentation of this type aimed at helping researchers think through the safety and training issues presented herein. Support for our recommendations comes from consulting 17 primary publications and 5 secondary reports/literature reviews of meditation side effects. Mental health consequences were the most frequently reported side effects, followed by physical health then spiritual health consequences. For each of these categories of potential adverse effects, we offer MM researchers methods to assess the relative risks of each as it pertains to their particular research programs.
对正念冥想(MM)的兴趣日益浓厚,这就需要讨论研究安全性。文献中报道了冥想的副作用以及可能的不良反应。然而,在MM研究领域,尚未制定并传播参与者筛选程序、研究安全指南以及研究人员培训标准。本文的目的是总结MM练习的安全问题,并为学者们提供一些在研究中使用的实用工具。例如,我们提供旨在确定潜在研究参与者禁忌状态的筛选示意图。此外,我们还提供了有关众多MM培训选项的信息。我们是首次进行此类展示,旨在帮助研究人员思考本文提出的安全和培训问题。我们的建议得到了对17篇主要出版物以及5篇关于冥想副作用的二次报告/文献综述的参考支持。心理健康方面的后果是最常报告的副作用,其次是身体健康方面,然后是精神健康方面的后果。对于这些潜在不良反应的每一类,我们为MM研究人员提供方法,以评估其与特定研究项目相关的相对风险。