Suppr超能文献

氨氯地平/缬沙坦固定剂量联合疗法与传统疗法的比较。

Comparison of amlodipine/valsartan fixed-dose combination therapy and conventional therapy.

作者信息

Malesker Mark A, Hilleman Daniel E

机构信息

Creighton University, School of Pharmacy and Health Professions, 2500 California Plaza, Omaha, NE 68178, USA.

出版信息

Manag Care. 2010 Jul;19(7):36-42.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Single-pill-combination (SPC) antihypertensive drug products have been shown to improve compliance but are associated with higher acquisition costs. This study compared the clinical and economic outcomes associated with the use of an SPC of amlodipine/valsartan (trade name Exforge) with the outcomes from conventional combination therapy in patients failing to respond to initial monotherapy with either a dihydropyridine calcium channel blocker (DHP-CCB) or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB).

DESIGN

We conducted a retrospective cohort study of hypertensive patients failing to respond to monotherapy with either a DHP-CCB or an ARB who were switched to an SPC of amlodipine/valsartan (SPC group) or to treatment that could not include any SPC (control group). The groups were matched for age, gender, race, baseline blood pressure (BP), and comorbidities. The primary outcomes of the study included the proportion of patients achieving BP targets, the absolute change in BP from baseline, the proportion of patients discontinuing drug therapy because of side effects, the proportion of patients non-compliant with drug therapy, and health care resource utilization and costs.

PRINCIPAL FINDINGS

Fifty-eight SPC patients achieved BP targets compared with 47 control patients (P = 0.119). The absolute reduction in BP was significantly greater in the SPC group (-22.8 +/- 6.9/-19.3 +/- 5.2 mmHg) than in the control group (-20.6 +/- 6.4/-17.8 +/- 5.6 mmHg) (P < 0.03). Significantly fewer patients discontinued anti-hypertensive therapy because of side effects and noncompliance in the SPC group compared with the control group (both P = 0.042). SPC patients accrued fewer clinic visits, laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms but had higher drug acquisition costs. Median medical therapy costs were significantly lower in the SPC group at the end of the 6-month follow-up, primarily because of lower costs for clinic visits.

CONCLUSION

The use of the SPC of amlodipine/valsartan was associated with greater absolute BP reductions and fewer antihypertensive drug discontinuations because of side effects and noncompliance compared with the use of the individual drugs. Although the acquisition cost of the SPC was greater than that of the individual drugs, SPC combination therapy resulted in fewer clinic visits, laboratory tests, and electrocardiograms. As a result, the total cost of SPC therapy was significantly less than that associated with the use of the individual drug components.

摘要

目的

单一片剂复方(SPC)抗高血压药物已被证明可提高依从性,但购置成本较高。本研究比较了使用氨氯地平/缬沙坦单一片剂复方(商品名Exforge)与传统联合治疗在对二氢吡啶类钙通道阻滞剂(DHP - CCB)或血管紧张素受体阻滞剂(ARB)初始单药治疗无反应的患者中的临床和经济结局。

设计

我们对那些对DHP - CCB或ARB单药治疗无反应,转而接受氨氯地平/缬沙坦单一片剂复方治疗(SPC组)或不包括任何SPC的治疗(对照组)的高血压患者进行了一项回顾性队列研究。两组在年龄、性别、种族、基线血压(BP)和合并症方面进行了匹配。该研究的主要结局包括达到血压目标的患者比例、血压相对于基线的绝对变化、因副作用而停止药物治疗的患者比例、不依从药物治疗的患者比例以及医疗保健资源利用和成本。

主要发现

58例SPC组患者达到血压目标,而对照组为47例(P = 0.119)。SPC组的血压绝对降低幅度(-22.8±6.9/-19.3±5.2 mmHg)显著大于对照组(-20.6±6.4/-17.8±5.6 mmHg)(P < 0.03)。与对照组相比,SPC组因副作用和不依从而停止抗高血压治疗的患者明显更少(两者P = 0.042)。SPC组患者的门诊就诊、实验室检查和心电图次数较少,但药物购置成本较高。在6个月随访结束时,SPC组的中位药物治疗成本显著较低,主要是因为门诊就诊成本较低。

结论

与使用单一药物相比,使用氨氯地平/缬沙坦单一片剂复方可使血压绝对降低幅度更大,且因副作用和不依从而停止抗高血压药物治疗的情况更少。虽然SPC的购置成本高于单一药物,但SPC联合治疗导致门诊就诊、实验室检查和心电图次数减少。因此,SPC治疗的总成本显著低于使用单一药物成分的成本。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验