Department of Psychiatry, The Zucker Hillside Hospital, 75-59 263rd St, Glen Oaks, NY 11004, USA.
J Clin Psychiatry. 2011 Feb;72(2):194-204. doi: 10.4088/JCP.07m03733yel. Epub 2010 Jul 27.
The comparative efficacy of second-generation antipsychotics has yet to be fully elucidated in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. The objective of this study was to examine the efficacy and safety of sertindole, compared to risperidone, in this patient population.
In this multicenter, phase 3, randomized, double-blind, parallel-group study, only patients with DSM-IV schizophrenia who had failed an adequate antipsychotic treatment within the previous 6 months and who had not responded positively to haloperidol during screening were eligible for enrollment. The primary efficacy variable was change in Positive and Negative Syndrome Scale (PANSS) from baseline to final assessment. Weekly assessments included the PANSS, the Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), the Scale for the Assessment of Negative Symptoms (SANS), and the Clinical Global Impressions (CGI) scale. The study was conducted between June 1996 and April 1998.
Of the 321 patients randomly assigned to double-blind treatment, 217 patients completed the study (sertindole, n/n = 142/216 [66%]; risperidone, n/n = 75/105 [71%]). The main reason for withdrawal in both groups was ineffective therapy. The between-group difference in PANSS total score was not statistically significant and both groups showed improvement, with mean changes of -18.6 in the sertindole group and -20.9 in the risperidone group based on observed cases and -12.0 and -19.0, respectively, based on the last-observation-carried-forward method for inputing missing data. There were no statistically significant differences between the groups in any of the secondary end points: PANSS positive and negative subscales, CGI scores, BPRS total scores and positive symptom subscale scores, and SANS total scores. Patients reported similar levels of adverse events and treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs), except for extrapyramidal syndrome-related TEAEs, which were more common in the risperidone-treated group. Prolongation of the QTc interval was observed significantly more frequently with sertindole treatment.
Sertindole and risperidone are effective and well-tolerated in patients with treatment-resistant schizophrenia. Sertindole offers an alternative treatment option for refractory patients in Europe given its good EPS profile, favorable metabolic profile, and comparable efficacy to risperidone.
第二代抗精神病药物在治疗抵抗性精神分裂症患者中的疗效尚不完全清楚。本研究旨在检验曲司氯铵与利培酮相比,在该患者人群中的疗效和安全性。
这是一项多中心、3 期、随机、双盲、平行分组研究,仅纳入符合 DSM-IV 精神分裂症诊断、在过去 6 个月内抗精神病药物治疗失败且在筛选期间对氟哌啶醇无阳性反应的患者。主要疗效变量为从基线到最终评估时阳性和阴性综合征量表(PANSS)的变化。每周评估包括 PANSS、简明精神病评定量表(BPRS)、阴性症状评定量表(SANS)和临床总体印象量表(CGI)。研究于 1996 年 6 月至 1998 年 4 月进行。
321 例随机分配至双盲治疗的患者中,217 例完成了研究(曲司氯铵,n/n=142/216[66%];利培酮,n/n=75/105[71%])。两组主要的停药原因均为治疗无效。基于观察到的病例,曲司氯铵组和利培酮组的 PANSS 总分差值无统计学意义,两组均有改善,分别为-18.6 和-20.9;基于最后一次观测向前结转法输入缺失数据,分别为-12.0 和-19.0。两组在任何次要终点上均无统计学差异:PANSS 阳性和阴性子量表、CGI 评分、BPRS 总分和阳性症状子量表评分以及 SANS 总分。患者报告的不良反应和治疗中出现的不良反应(TEAE)水平相似,除锥体外系综合征相关的 TEAE 外,利培酮组更为常见。曲司氯铵治疗时 QTc 间期延长的发生率显著升高。
曲司氯铵和利培酮在治疗抵抗性精神分裂症患者中均有效且耐受良好。鉴于曲司氯铵良好的锥体外系综合征(EPS)特征、有利的代谢特征和与利培酮相当的疗效,在欧洲,它为难治性患者提供了一种替代治疗选择。