Hulleman Johan
Department of Psychology, University of Hull, Cottingham Road, Hull HU6 7RX, United Kingdom.
Vision Res. 2010 Sep 24;50(20):2069-79. doi: 10.1016/j.visres.2010.07.017. Epub 2010 Jul 29.
Several theories and models of visual search assume that inhibitory tagging of items is used to improve the efficiency of the search process, by discouraging revisits of previously inspected and rejected items. Therefore, search should become less efficient when the search display consists of moving items. In four experiments this hypothesis was tested. In the first two experiments there was no difference between search amongst static and moving items even though motion conditions were blocked (Experiment 1), or displays contained up to 36 items (Experiment 2). However, in Experiments 3 and 4, where the items used in the search display forced the participants to keep track of individual items performance dropped when the items moved. Visual search showed a remarkable robustness against motion, which current theories and models of visual search have difficulties to describe. Taken together, the results reported here indicate that there is a difference between the processes used in easier search and those used in search where items need to be individuated. A framework encompassing these results is proposed.
几种视觉搜索理论和模型假定,通过抑制对先前检查和排除项目的重新访问,对项目进行抑制性标记可提高搜索过程的效率。因此,当搜索显示由移动项目组成时,搜索效率应会降低。在四项实验中对这一假设进行了测试。在前两项实验中,静态项目与移动项目之间的搜索没有差异,即使运动条件受到限制(实验1),或者显示包含多达36个项目(实验2)。然而,在实验3和实验4中,搜索显示中使用的项目迫使参与者跟踪单个项目,当项目移动时,表现会下降。视觉搜索对运动表现出显著的稳健性,当前的视觉搜索理论和模型难以对此进行描述。综上所述,此处报告的结果表明,较简单搜索中使用的过程与需要区分项目的搜索中使用的过程存在差异。提出了一个包含这些结果的框架。