Suppr超能文献

静态和动态搜索任务之间策略差异的新证据:个体观察者眼动分析。

New Evidence for Strategic Differences between Static and Dynamic Search Tasks: An Individual Observer Analysis of Eye Movements.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Appalachian State University Boone, NC, USA.

出版信息

Front Psychol. 2013 Jan 29;4:8. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00008. eCollection 2013.

Abstract

Two experiments are reported that further explore the processes underlying dynamic search. In Experiment 1, observers' oculomotor behavior was monitored while they searched for a randomly oriented T among oriented L distractors under static and dynamic viewing conditions. Despite similar search slopes, eye movements were less frequent and more spatially constrained under dynamic viewing relative to static, with misses also increasing more with target eccentricity in the dynamic condition. These patterns suggest that dynamic search involves a form of sit-and-wait strategy in which search is restricted to a small group of items surrounding fixation. To evaluate this interpretation, we developed a computational model of a sit-and-wait process hypothesized to underlie dynamic search. In Experiment 2 we tested this model by varying fixation position in the display and found that display positions optimized for a sit-and-wait strategy resulted in higher d' values relative to a less optimal location. We conclude that different strategies, and therefore underlying processes, are used to search static and dynamic displays.

摘要

报告了两项实验,进一步探讨了动态搜索背后的过程。在实验 1 中,在静态和动态观察条件下,观察者在搜索随机定向的 T 与定向 L 干扰物时,监测他们的眼球运动行为。尽管搜索斜率相似,但相对于静态观察,眼球运动在动态观察下频率较低且空间受限,在动态条件下,随着目标离中心的距离增加,漏报也会增加。这些模式表明,动态搜索涉及一种坐待策略,其中搜索仅限于围绕注视点的一小组项目。为了评估这种解释,我们开发了一个坐待过程的计算模型,假设该模型是动态搜索的基础。在实验 2 中,我们通过改变显示中的注视位置来测试该模型,发现对于坐待策略来说,优化的显示位置相对于不太理想的位置会产生更高的 d' 值。我们得出结论,静态和动态显示使用不同的策略,因此也使用不同的潜在过程。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4a8e/3557443/3c547e60b2eb/fpsyg-04-00008-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验