University of North Carolina Institute of Marine Sciences, 3431 Arendell Street, Morehead City, NC 28557, USA.
Water Res. 2010 Sep;44(16):4704-15. doi: 10.1016/j.watres.2010.07.004. Epub 2010 Jul 13.
In the New River Estuary (NRE) in eastern North Carolina (NC), fecal indicator bacteria (FIB) levels exceed water quality standards, leading to closure of estuarine waters for shellfishing and classification of parts of the estuary as "impaired" per the Clean Water Act section 303(d) list. As a means to investigate fecal contamination and loading of FIB to the NRE, a continuous automated sampler (ISCO) outfitted with flow modules and water quality probes was placed in four first-order tidal creek headwaters. Total storm discharge and bacterial load for Escherichia coli (EC) and Enterococcus spp. (ENT) were calculated using graphical volumetric flow calculations and interpolation of FIB measurements over each storm's duration for 10 storms. Mean total load of 10(9)-10(12) EC and ENT cells (MPN) occurred over the course of each storm. Total storm loading, averaged across all storms, was as much as 30 and 37 times greater than equivalent duration of baseflow loading for EC and ENT, respectively. Within the first 30% of creek storm volume for all storms and all creeks combined, a mean cumulative load of only 37% and 44% of the total EC and ENT cells, respectively, was discharged, indicating these creeks are not demonstrating a 'first flush' scenario for FIB. The median storm Event Mean Concentrations (EMCs) were 6.37 × 10(2) and 2.03 × 10(2) MPN/100 mL, for EC and ENT, respectively, compared with median baseflow concentrations of 1.48 × 10(2) and 4.84 × 10(1) for EC and ENT, respectively, and were significantly different between base and storm flow events. FIB was correlated with TSS (weak), flow rate (strong), and different stages (base, rising, peak, and falling) of the hydrograph (strong). Pollutographs indicate large intra-storm variability of FIB, and the need for more intensive sampling throughout a storm in order to attain accurate FIB contaminant estimates. Instream sediment concentrations ranged from 5 to 478 (MPN/g) and 13 to 776 (MPN/g) for EC and ENT, respectively, indicating sediment as a source, but a minor reservoir. This overall approach for calculating loading in headwater tidal creeks is detailed. Accurate loading characterization of FIB during storms and dry weather conditions, and understanding intra-storm FIB concentrations, is imperative for understanding patterns of water quality impairment, establishing management planning, and developing appropriate mitigation strategies.
在北卡罗来纳州(NC)东部的新河河口(NRE),粪便指示菌(FIB)水平超过水质标准,导致贝类捕捞关闭,并根据《清洁水法》第 303(d)条清单,将部分河口归类为“受损”。为了调查 FIB 对 NRE 的粪便污染和负荷情况,在四条一级潮汐溪源头安装了配备流量模块和水质探头的连续自动采样器(ISCO)。使用图形体积流量计算和每个风暴持续时间内 FIB 测量的插值,计算了总暴雨排放量和大肠杆菌(EC)和肠球菌属(ENT)的细菌负荷。在每个风暴过程中,平均每 10(9)-10(12)EC 和 ENT 细胞(MPN)的总负荷。所有风暴的总暴雨负荷平均是 EC 和 ENT 等效持续基流负荷的 30 倍和 37 倍。在所有风暴和所有溪流的前 30%的溪流风暴体积内,仅排放了总 EC 和 ENT 细胞总负荷的 37%和 44%,表明这些溪流没有表现出 FIB 的“初次冲刷”情况。EC 和 ENT 的中位风暴事件平均浓度(EMC)分别为 6.37×10(2)和 2.03×10(2)MPN/100 mL,而 EC 和 ENT 的中位基流浓度分别为 1.48×10(2)和 4.84×10(1),并且在基流和风暴流事件之间存在显著差异。FIB 与 TSS(弱)、流速(强)和水文图的不同阶段(基流、上升、峰值和下降)(强)相关。污染图表明 FIB 的内流变异性较大,需要在整个风暴期间进行更密集的采样,以获得准确的 FIB 污染物估计值。EC 和 ENT 的溪流沉积物浓度分别为 5 至 478(MPN/g)和 13 至 776(MPN/g),表明沉积物是一个来源,但只是一个次要的储存库。详细介绍了计算上游潮汐溪流负荷的这种整体方法。了解风暴和旱季期间 FIB 的准确负荷特征以及了解风暴内的 FIB 浓度对于了解水质受损模式、建立管理规划和制定适当的缓解策略至关重要。