Daveau C, Stevens D, Labib A, Berges O, Moisson P, De la Lande B, Le Scodan R
Département de radiothérapie, centre René-Huguenin, hôpital René Huguenin, institut Curie, 35, rue Dailly, 92210 Saint-Cloud, France.
Cancer Radiother. 2010 Dec;14(8):711-7. doi: 10.1016/j.canrad.2010.03.019. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
Neoadjuvant chemotherapy generally induces significant changes in the pathological extent of disease. This potential down-staging challenges the standard indications of adjuvant radiation therapy. We assessed the utility of lymph node irradiation in breast cancer patients with pathological N0 status (pN0) after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast-conserving surgery.
Among 1054 breast cancer patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy in our institution between 1990 and 2004, 248 patients with clinical N0 or N1-N2 lymph node status at diagnosis had pN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and breast-conserving surgery. Cox regression analysis was used to identify factors influencing locoregional recurrence-free survival, disease-free survival and overall survival.
All 248 patients received breast irradiation, and 158 patients (63.7%) also received lymph node irradiation. With a median follow-up of 88 months, the 5-year locoregional recurrence-free survival and overall survival rates were respectively 89.4% and 88.7% with lymph node irradiation and 86.2% and 92% without lymph node irradiation (no significant difference). Survival was poorer among patients who did not have a pathological complete primary tumor response (pCR) (hazards ratio [HR]=3.05; 95% CI, 1.17 to 7.99) and in patients with N1-N2 clinical status at diagnosis ([HR]=2.24; 95% CI, 1.15 to 4.36). Lymph node irradiation did not significantly affect survival.
Relative to combined breast and local lymph node irradiation, isolated breast irradiation does not appear to be associated with a higher risk of locoregional relapse or death among breast cancer patients with pN0 status after neoadjuvant chemotherapy. These results need to be confirmed in a prospective study.
新辅助化疗通常会使疾病的病理范围发生显著变化。这种潜在的降期对辅助放疗的标准适应证提出了挑战。我们评估了新辅助化疗及保乳手术后病理N0状态(pN0)的乳腺癌患者进行淋巴结照射的效用。
1990年至2004年间在我们机构接受新辅助化疗的1054例乳腺癌患者中,248例诊断时临床为N0或N1 - N2淋巴结状态的患者在新辅助化疗及保乳手术后为pN0状态。采用Cox回归分析来确定影响局部区域无复发生存率、无病生存率和总生存率的因素。
所有248例患者均接受了乳腺照射,158例患者(63.7%)还接受了淋巴结照射。中位随访88个月,接受淋巴结照射的患者5年局部区域无复发生存率和总生存率分别为89.4%和88.7%,未接受淋巴结照射的患者分别为86.2%和92%(无显著差异)。病理原发性肿瘤未达到完全缓解(pCR)的患者生存率较差(风险比[HR]=3.05;95%可信区间,1.17至7.99),诊断时为N1 - N2临床状态的患者生存率也较差([HR]=2.24;95%可信区间,1.15至4.36)。淋巴结照射对生存率无显著影响。
相对于乳腺和局部淋巴结联合照射,单纯乳腺照射似乎与新辅助化疗后pN0状态的乳腺癌患者局部区域复发或死亡风险较高无关。这些结果需要在前瞻性研究中得到证实。