Suppr超能文献

各种任务中使用测力鞋测定关节力矩。

Determination of joint moments with instrumented force shoes in a variety of tasks.

机构信息

Research Institute MOVE, Faculty of Human Movement Sciences, VU University Amsterdam, Van der Boechorststraat 9, 1081 BT Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

J Biomech. 2010 Oct 19;43(14):2848-54. doi: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2010.06.005. Epub 2010 Aug 2.

Abstract

Ground reaction forces (GRFs) are often used in inverse dynamics analyses to determine joint loading. These GRFs are usually measured using force plates (FPs). As an alternative, instrumented force shoes (FSs) can be used, which have the advantage over FPs that they do not constrain foot placement. This study tested the FS system in one normal weight subject (77kg) performing 19 different lifting, pushing and pulling and walking tasks. Kinematics were measured with an optoelectronic system and the GRFs and the positions of the centre of pressure (CoP) were synchronously measured with FPs and FSs. Differences between the outcomes of the two measurement systems (i.e. CoP and GRFs) and the resulting ankle and L5/S1 joint moments were determined at the instant of the peak GRF (DaPF). For most lifting and pushing and pulling tasks, the difference between the FP and FS measurements remained small: GRF DaPF remained below 3% body weight, CoP DaPF remained below 10mm, ankle moment DaPF remained below 7% of the peak total ankle moment that occurred during normal walking and L5/S1 moment DaPF remained below 7% of the peak total L5/S1 moment that occurred during normal symmetric lifting. More substantial differences were only found in the maximal pushing tasks. For the walking tasks, peak vertical GRFs were somewhat underestimated. However, differences in ankle and L5/S1 moments remained small, i.e. DaPF below 7% of the peak total moment that occurred during normal walking.

摘要

地面反作用力(GRF)常用于逆动力学分析以确定关节负荷。这些 GRF 通常使用力板(FP)测量。作为替代方法,也可以使用测力鞋(FS),其相对于 FP 的优势在于不会限制脚部放置。本研究在一名正常体重受试者(77kg)中测试了 FS 系统,该受试者执行了 19 种不同的举升、推和拉以及行走任务。运动学使用光电系统进行测量,GRF 和压力中心(CoP)位置与 FP 和 FS 同步测量。两种测量系统(即 CoP 和 GRF)的结果之间的差异以及由此产生的踝关节和 L5/S1 关节力矩在 GRF 峰值时刻(DaPF)确定。对于大多数举升、推和拉任务,FP 和 FS 测量之间的差异保持较小:GRF DaPF 保持在 3%以下体重,CoP DaPF 保持在 10mm 以下,踝关节力矩 DaPF 保持在正常行走时发生的总踝关节力矩峰值的 7%以下,L5/S1 力矩 DaPF 保持在正常对称举升时发生的总 L5/S1 力矩峰值的 7%以下。仅在最大推任务中发现了更大的差异。对于行走任务,垂直 GRF 的峰值有些低估。然而,踝关节和 L5/S1 力矩的差异仍然较小,即 DaPF 低于正常行走时发生的总力矩峰值的 7%。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验