Unité Mixte de Recherche 5227, Centre National de la Recherche Scientifique, Université Victor Segalen Bordeaux 2, Bordeaux, France.
PLoS One. 2010 Jul 28;5(7):e11592. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0011592.
Assessing the relative value of cocaine and how it changes with chronic drug use represents a long-standing goal in addiction research. Surprisingly, recent experiments in rats--by far the most frequently used animal model in this field--suggest that the value of cocaine is lower than previously thought.
METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: Here we report a series of choice experiments that better define the relative position of cocaine on the value ladder of rats (i.e., preference rank-ordering of different rewards). Rats were allowed to choose either taking cocaine or drinking water sweetened with saccharin--a nondrug alternative that is not biologically essential. By systematically varying the cost and concentration of sweet water, we found that cocaine is low on the value ladder of the large majority of rats, near the lowest concentrations of sweet water. In addition, a retrospective analysis of all experiments over the past 5 years revealed that no matter how heavy was past cocaine use most rats readily give up cocaine use in favor of the nondrug alternative. Only a minority, fewer than 15% at the heaviest level of past cocaine use, continued to take cocaine, even when hungry and offered a natural sugar that could relieve their need of calories.
CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This pattern of results (cocaine abstinence in most rats; cocaine preference in few rats) maps well onto the epidemiology of human cocaine addiction and suggests that only a minority of rats would be vulnerable to cocaine addiction while the large majority would be resilient despite extensive drug use. Resilience to drug addiction has long been suspected in humans but could not be firmly established, mostly because it is difficult to control retrospectively for differences in drug self-exposure and/or availability in human drug users. This conclusion has important implications for preclinical research on the neurobiology of cocaine addiction and for future medication development.
评估可卡因的相对价值及其随慢性药物使用而变化的情况,是成瘾研究中的一个长期目标。令人惊讶的是,最近在大鼠身上进行的实验——这是该领域最常使用的动物模型——表明可卡因的价值低于先前的预期。
方法/主要发现:在这里,我们报告了一系列选择实验,这些实验更好地定义了大鼠可卡因在价值阶梯上的相对位置(即,不同奖励的偏好排序)。大鼠被允许选择服用可卡因或饮用用糖精加糖的水——一种非药物替代品,对生物没有必要。通过系统地改变甜水的成本和浓度,我们发现可卡因在大多数大鼠的价值阶梯中处于低位,接近甜水的最低浓度。此外,对过去 5 年所有实验的回顾性分析表明,无论过去可卡因的使用量有多大,大多数大鼠都很容易放弃可卡因,转而选择非药物替代品。只有少数大鼠(过去可卡因使用量最重的不到 15%)继续服用可卡因,即使在饥饿时,也会提供一种天然的糖来缓解他们对卡路里的需求。
结论/意义:这种结果模式(大多数大鼠戒断可卡因;少数大鼠偏好可卡因)与人类可卡因成瘾的流行病学非常吻合,表明只有少数大鼠容易对可卡因上瘾,而大多数大鼠尽管大量使用药物,但仍具有抗药性。人类对药物成瘾的抗药性长期以来一直受到怀疑,但由于难以回顾性地控制药物自我暴露和/或人类药物使用者的可用性的差异,因此无法确定。这一结论对可卡因成瘾的神经生物学的临床前研究和未来的药物开发具有重要意义。