Vandaele Youna, Cantin Lauriane, Serre Fuschia, Vouillac-Mendoza Caroline, Ahmed Serge H
Université de Bordeaux, Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR CNRS 5293, Bordeaux, France.
Institut des Maladies Neurodégénératives, UMR CNRS 5293, Bordeaux, France.
Neuropsychopharmacology. 2016 Jan;41(2):646-57. doi: 10.1038/npp.2015.195. Epub 2015 Jul 1.
Ample evidence shows that the setting can control drug choices in both humans and animals. Here we reveal in rats that a major mechanism of this control involves a regulation of the drug influence on other competing options at the time of choice. Briefly, rats were offered a choice between a drug dose (cocaine or heroin) and a brief access to water sweetened with saccharin in two different settings. In one setting, choosing under the influence was not possible and rats largely preferred saccharin over either cocaine or heroin. In contrast, when the same rats were shifted to a setting where choosing under the influence was possible, they chose the drug either nonexclusively or exclusively depending on whether the drug enhanced or suppressed sweet reward, respectively. Thus, when rats were under the orexigenic influence of heroin at the time of choice, they more frequently chose saccharin in alternation with heroin. In contrast, when rats were under the anorexic influence of cocaine, they stopped choosing saccharin and continued taking cocaine exclusively. These setting- and drug-specific changes in preference were rapid and reversible, and could be induced by passively administering cocaine or heroin before choice. Finally, rats behaved as if they were oblivious to the drug influence on their choices. This behavior could explain why rats are vulnerable to harm themselves, sometimes to the point of death, in settings where choices are made under the drug influence, notably if this influence excludes other important options or, conversely, enhances harmful ones.
大量证据表明,环境能够控制人类和动物的药物选择。在此我们在大鼠身上揭示,这种控制的一个主要机制涉及在选择时对药物对其他竞争选项的影响进行调节。简而言之,在两种不同环境下,给大鼠提供在药物剂量(可卡因或海洛因)和短暂接触用糖精增甜的水之间进行选择的机会。在一种环境中,在药物影响下进行选择是不可能的,大鼠在很大程度上更喜欢糖精而非可卡因或海洛因。相比之下,当将同样的大鼠转移到一个在药物影响下可以进行选择的环境中时,它们分别根据药物增强还是抑制甜味奖励,要么非排他性地要么排他性地选择药物。因此,当大鼠在选择时受到海洛因的促食欲影响时,它们更频繁地交替选择糖精和海洛因。相比之下,当大鼠受到可卡因的厌食影响时,它们停止选择糖精并继续只服用可卡因。这些在偏好上特定于环境和药物的变化迅速且可逆,并且可以通过在选择前被动给予可卡因或海洛因来诱导。最后,大鼠的行为就好像它们没有意识到药物对其选择的影响。这种行为可以解释为什么大鼠在药物影响下进行选择的环境中容易伤害自己,有时甚至到死亡的程度,特别是如果这种影响排除了其他重要选项,或者相反,增强了有害选项。