Suppr超能文献

采用联合拭子培养法检测孕妇无乳链球菌定植情况:横断面患病率研究

Detection of Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in pregnant women by using combined swab cultures: cross-sectional prevalence study.

作者信息

Marconi Camila, Rocchetti Talita Trevizani, Rall Vera Lúcia Mores, Carvalho Lidia Raquel de, Borges Vera Terezinha Medeiros, Silva Márcia Guimarães da

机构信息

Department of Pathology, Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista, Botucatu, São Paulo, Brazil.

出版信息

Sao Paulo Med J. 2010;128(2):60-2. doi: 10.1590/s1516-31802010000200003.

Abstract

CONTEXT AND OBJECTIVE

Maternal Streptococcus agalactiae colonization and early-onset neonatal sepsis have aroused interest in the worldwide literature. Streptococcal neonatal disease is associated with significant morbidity and mortality in the perinatal period, especially among premature neonates. The aim of this study was to assess the prevalence of maternal streptococcal colonization by using combined swab cultures, compared with swab collection from a single site.

DESIGN AND SETTING

Cross-sectional study at Faculdade de Medicina de Botucatu, Universidade Estadual Paulista.

METHODS

Samples were obtained from 405 patients at gestational ages of 35 to 37 weeks. Swabs from the perianal (rectal) region, vaginal introitus and upper lateral vaginal vault were cultured in Todd-Hewitt selective broth. Colonies suggestive of Streptococcus agalactiae were subjected to the catalase and CAMP (Christie, Atkins, Munch-Petersen) tests. To evaluate the positivity of combined swab cultures, Tukey's test was used for comparison of proportions.

RESULTS

The prevalence of streptococcal colonization was 25.4%. Among the patients with positive cultures, 28.1% had this at only one collection site, 24.2% simultaneously at two sites and 47.5% at all three sites. Associating the swabs from two collection sites significantly increased streptococcal isolation, compared with a single swab (P < 0.05), except for perianal (rectal) collection. Use of combined swabs from three collection sites showed statistically higher isolation rates.

CONCLUSION

In combined swab cultures collected from three collection sites, the prevalence of maternal Streptococcus agalactiae colonization was higher than in swabs collected from a single site.

摘要

背景与目的

孕产妇无乳链球菌定植与早发型新生儿败血症已引起全球文献的关注。链球菌性新生儿疾病在围产期与显著的发病率和死亡率相关,尤其是在早产儿中。本研究的目的是通过联合拭子培养评估孕产妇链球菌定植的患病率,并与单个部位的拭子采集进行比较。

设计与地点

在圣保罗州立大学博图卡图医学院进行的横断面研究。

方法

从405例孕龄为35至37周的患者中获取样本。将来自肛周(直肠)区域、阴道口和阴道穹窿上外侧的拭子在托德-休伊特选择性肉汤中培养。对疑似无乳链球菌的菌落进行过氧化氢酶和CAMP(克里斯蒂、阿特金斯、蒙克-彼得森)试验。为评估联合拭子培养的阳性率,采用Tukey检验比较比例。

结果

链球菌定植的患病率为25.4%。在培养阳性的患者中,28.1%仅在一个采集部位呈阳性,24.2%在两个部位同时呈阳性,47.5%在所有三个部位均呈阳性。与单个拭子相比,将两个采集部位的拭子联合使用显著提高了链球菌的分离率(P < 0.05),肛周(直肠)采集除外。使用来自三个采集部位的联合拭子显示分离率在统计学上更高。

结论

在从三个采集部位收集的联合拭子培养中,孕产妇无乳链球菌定植的患病率高于从单个部位收集的拭子。

相似文献

5
Vaginal-perianal compared with vaginal-rectal cultures for identification of group B streptococci.
Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Nov;104(5 Pt 1):1058-61. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000144120.20312.ed.
6
[Prevalence of colonization by group B Streptococcus in pregnant women from a public maternity of Northwest region of Brazil].
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2008 Jun;30(6):274-80. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032008000600002.
7
[Group B streptococcus maternal and neonatal colonization in preterm rupture of membranes and preterm labor].
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2009 Aug;31(8):397-403. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032009000800005.
10
Evaluation of Group B Streptococcus Differential Agar for detection and isolation of Streptococcus agalactiae.
Clin Microbiol Infect. 2005 Aug;11(8):676-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1469-0691.2005.01195.x.

引用本文的文献

1
Do NAAT-Based Methods Increase the Diagnostic Sensitivity of Carriage Detection in Pregnant Women?
Diagnostics (Basel). 2023 Feb 23;13(5):863. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics13050863.
4
Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women in Brazil: prevalence, serotypes, and antibiotic resistance.
Braz J Microbiol. 2019 Oct;50(4):943-952. doi: 10.1007/s42770-019-00129-8. Epub 2019 Aug 20.
5
Assessment of conventional PCR and real-time PCR compared to the gold standard method for screening Streptococcus agalactiae in pregnant women.
Braz J Infect Dis. 2018 Nov-Dec;22(6):449-454. doi: 10.1016/j.bjid.2018.09.005. Epub 2018 Nov 22.
6
Streptococcus agalactiae carriage among pregnant women living in Rio de Janeiro, Brazil, over a period of eight years.
PLoS One. 2018 May 11;13(5):e0196925. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0196925. eCollection 2018.
7
Prevalence of Streptococcus agalactiae colonization in pregnant women from the 18th Health Region of Paraná State.
Rev Inst Med Trop Sao Paulo. 2018;60:e2. doi: 10.1590/s1678-9946201860002. Epub 2018 Feb 15.
8
The prevalence and risk factors of group B streptococcus colonization in Iranian pregnant women.
Electron Physician. 2017 May 25;9(5):4399-4404. doi: 10.19082/4399. eCollection 2017 May.
9
Group B Streptococci Colonization in Pregnant Guatemalan Women: Prevalence, Risk Factors, and Vaginal Microbiome.
Open Forum Infect Dis. 2017 Feb 8;4(1):ofx020. doi: 10.1093/ofid/ofx020. eCollection 2017 Winter.
10
DNA microarray-based typing of Streptococcus agalactiae isolates.
J Clin Microbiol. 2014 Nov;52(11):3933-43. doi: 10.1128/JCM.02411-14. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

本文引用的文献

1
[Prevalence of colonization by group B Streptococcus in pregnant women from a public maternity of Northwest region of Brazil].
Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2008 Jun;30(6):274-80. doi: 10.1590/s0100-72032008000600002.
3
Group B streptococcus infection in pregnancy.
Clin Perinatol. 2007 Sep;34(3):387-92. doi: 10.1016/j.clp.2007.03.012.
5
Consequences of prophylaxis for group B streptococcal infections of the neonate.
Semin Perinatol. 2007 Feb;31(1):33-8. doi: 10.1053/j.semperi.2007.01.005.
6
Colonization by Streptococcus agalactiae during pregnancy: maternal and perinatal prognosis.
Braz J Infect Dis. 2005 Aug;9(4):276-82. doi: 10.1590/s1413-86702005000400002. Epub 2005 Nov 1.
7
Evaluation of a new selective enrichment broth for detection of group B streptococci in pregnant women.
J Clin Microbiol. 2005 Feb;43(2):896-7. doi: 10.1128/JCM.43.2.896-897.2005.
9
Group B streptococcal disease in UK and Irish infants younger than 90 days.
Lancet. 2004 Jan 24;363(9405):292-4. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)15389-5.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验