• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

影响肯尼亚肉牛和奶牛记录系统效率的因素:SWOT-AHP分析

Factors that influence the efficiency of beef and dairy cattle recording system in Kenya: A SWOT-AHP analysis.

作者信息

Wasike Chrilukovian B, Magothe Thomas M, Kahi Alexander K, Peters Kurt J

机构信息

Department of Animal breeding in the Tropics and Subtropics, Humboldt University of Berlin, Philippstrasse 13, Haus 9, 10115, Berlin, Germany.

出版信息

Trop Anim Health Prod. 2011 Jan;43(1):141-52. doi: 10.1007/s11250-010-9666-3. Epub 2010 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1007/s11250-010-9666-3
PMID:20676763
Abstract

Animal recording in Kenya is characterised by erratic producer participation and high drop-out rates from the national recording scheme. This study evaluates factors influencing efficiency of beef and dairy cattle recording system. Factors influencing efficiency of animal identification and registration, pedigree and performance recording, and genetic evaluation and information utilisation were generated using qualitative and participatory methods. Pairwise comparison of factors was done by strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats-analytical hierarchical process analysis and priority scores to determine their relative importance to the system calculated using Eigenvalue method. For identification and registration, and evaluation and information utilisation, external factors had high priority scores. For pedigree and performance recording, threats and weaknesses had the highest priority scores. Strengths factors could not sustain the required efficiency of the system. Weaknesses of the system predisposed it to threats. Available opportunities could be explored as interventions to restore efficiency in the system. Defensive strategies such as reorienting the system to offer utility benefits to recording, forming symbiotic and binding collaboration between recording organisations and NARS, and development of institutions to support recording were feasible.

摘要

肯尼亚的动物记录工作存在生产者参与不稳定以及国家记录计划辍学率高的特点。本研究评估了影响肉牛和奶牛记录系统效率的因素。使用定性和参与式方法确定了影响动物识别与登记、系谱与性能记录以及遗传评估与信息利用效率的因素。通过优势、劣势、机会和威胁——层次分析法对各因素进行两两比较,并使用特征值法计算优先级分数,以确定它们对系统的相对重要性。对于识别与登记以及评估与信息利用,外部因素具有较高的优先级分数。对于系谱与性能记录,威胁和劣势的优先级分数最高。优势因素无法维持系统所需的效率。系统的劣势使其容易受到威胁。可以探索现有机会作为恢复系统效率的干预措施。诸如重新调整系统以提供记录实用效益、在记录组织与国家农业研究系统之间形成共生和有约束力的合作以及发展支持记录的机构等防御策略是可行的。

相似文献

1
Factors that influence the efficiency of beef and dairy cattle recording system in Kenya: A SWOT-AHP analysis.影响肯尼亚肉牛和奶牛记录系统效率的因素:SWOT-AHP分析
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2011 Jan;43(1):141-52. doi: 10.1007/s11250-010-9666-3. Epub 2010 Jul 31.
2
Exploration of conservation and development strategies with a limited stakeholder approach for local cattle breeds.以有限的利益相关者方法探索地方牛种的保护与发展策略。
Animal. 2019 Dec;13(12):2922-2931. doi: 10.1017/S1751731119001447. Epub 2019 Jun 26.
3
Reliability of breeding values for feed intake and feed efficiency traits in dairy cattle: When dry matter intake recordings are sparse under different scenarios.奶牛饲料采食量和饲料效率性状的育种值可靠性:在不同情况下干物质采食量记录稀疏时。
J Dairy Sci. 2019 Aug;102(8):7248-7262. doi: 10.3168/jds.2018-16020. Epub 2019 May 31.
4
The use of SWOT analysis to explore and prioritize conservation and development strategies for local cattle breeds.运用 SWOT 分析探索并优先考虑本地牛种的保护和发展策略。
Animal. 2013 Jun;7(6):885-94. doi: 10.1017/S175173111200242X. Epub 2012 Dec 20.
5
Coronavirus disease-2019 risk management using strengths, weaknesses, opportunities, threats analysis approach in the health system: A qualitative multimethod study.运用优势、劣势、机会、威胁分析方法进行2019冠状病毒病风险管理:一项定性多方法研究
J Educ Health Promot. 2021 Dec 31;10:453. doi: 10.4103/jehp.jehp_1599_20. eCollection 2021.
6
Optimizing the design of small-sized nucleus breeding programs for dairy cattle with minimal performance recording.在性能记录最少的情况下优化奶牛小型核心育种计划的设计。
J Dairy Sci. 2014 Dec;97(12):7963-74. doi: 10.3168/jds.2014-8545. Epub 2014 Oct 3.
7
Sustainable development goals assessment of Erzurum province with SWOT-AHP analysis.基于SWOT-AHP分析的埃尔祖鲁姆省可持续发展目标评估
Environ Dev Sustain. 2022;24(3):2986-3012. doi: 10.1007/s10668-021-01584-w. Epub 2021 Jun 17.
8
Use of SNP genotyping to determine pedigree and breed composition of dairy cattle in Kenya.利用 SNP 基因分型技术鉴定肯尼亚奶牛的系谱和品种组成。
J Anim Breed Genet. 2010 Oct;127(5):348-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1439-0388.2010.00864.x.
9
Analysis of Strengths, Weaknesses, Opportunities, and Threats as a Tool for Translating Evidence into Individualized Medical Strategies (I-SWOT).作为将证据转化为个体化医疗策略的工具的优势、劣势、机会和威胁分析(I-SWOT)。
Aorta (Stamford). 2015 Jun 1;3(3):98-107. doi: 10.12945/j.aorta.2015.14.064. eCollection 2015 Jun.
10
Animal and management factors associated with weight gain in dairy calves and heifers on smallholder dairy farms in Kenya.肯尼亚小农户奶牛场中与犊牛和小母牛体重增加相关的动物及管理因素。
Prev Vet Med. 2018 Dec 1;161:60-68. doi: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2018.10.017. Epub 2018 Oct 26.

引用本文的文献

1
A systematic review and meta-analysis of effect of mutant traits in chickens.鸡突变性状效应的系统评价与荟萃分析。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2025 Oct 13;57(8):437. doi: 10.1007/s11250-025-04624-z.
2
Multi-criteria decision analysis for supporting the selection of subclinical mastitis screening tests to use in large- and small-scale dairy farms in Türkiye.多准则决策分析支持在土耳其的大型和小型奶牛场中选择亚临床乳腺炎筛选试验。
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2023 Dec 7;56(1):6. doi: 10.1007/s11250-023-03844-5.
3
Impact of the Trade-Related Aspect of Intellectual Property Rights Agreement on Pharmaceutical Industry in Developing Countries: A Scoping Review.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct and maternal (co)variance components and genetic parameters for growth and reproductive traits in the Boran cattle in Kenya.肯尼亚博拉牛生长和繁殖性状的直接和母体(协)方差分量及遗传参数
Trop Anim Health Prod. 2009 Jun;41(5):741-8. doi: 10.1007/s11250-008-9246-y. Epub 2008 Oct 29.
《与贸易有关的知识产权协定》对发展中国家制药行业的影响:一项范围综述
Iran J Pharm Res. 2021 Fall;20(4):339-351. doi: 10.22037/ijpr.2021.115264.15282.