Suppr超能文献

经典 Limberg 皮瓣与改良 Limberg 皮瓣治疗藏毛窦疾病的比较:416 例回顾性分析。

Comparison of the classic Limberg flap and modified Limberg flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective analysis of 416 patients.

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Gazi University Medical School, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Surg Today. 2010 Aug;40(8):757-62. doi: 10.1007/s00595-008-4098-7. Epub 2010 Jul 30.

Abstract

PURPOSE

Pilonidal sinus disease (PSD) is usually seen on the sacrococcygeal region in adolescent patients. The current study analyzed the outcome of the rhomboid excision and the Limberg flap procedure (cLF) in comparison to the modified Limberg flap procedure (mlF) for PSD.

METHODS

Four hundred and sixteen patients with PSD were operated on under spinal or general anesthesia by cLF and mlF. The patients were divided into two groups. In Group 1, cLF was performed on 211 patients. In Group 2, mlF was performed on 205 patients.

RESULTS

No significant difference was detected between Groups 1 and 2 in terms of sex, age, preoperative disease period, follow-up time, the mean hospital stay, and hypoesthesia. The mlF group had better clinical results than the cLF group. The recurrence rate was statistically higher in the cLF group 1 than in the mlF group (P = 0.036). The time to return to work, time to walk without pain, and time to be able to sit on the toilet without pain were longer in the cLF group (P = 0.001). The maceration and wound infection rate were statistically higher in the cLF group than in the mlF group (P = 0.020 and P = 0.019, respectively).

CONCLUSION

The mlF is a more effective treatment than cLF for the surgical management of PSD.

摘要

目的

藏毛窦疾病(PSD)通常见于青少年患者的骶尾部。本研究分析了菱形切除术和 Limberg 皮瓣术(cLF)与改良 Limberg 皮瓣术(mlF)治疗 PSD 的效果。

方法

416 例 PSD 患者在脊髓或全身麻醉下接受 cLF 和 mlF 手术。患者分为两组。在第 1 组中,对 211 例患者进行 cLF。在第 2 组中,对 205 例患者进行 mlF。

结果

1 组和 2 组在性别、年龄、术前疾病期、随访时间、平均住院时间和感觉迟钝方面无统计学差异。mlF 组的临床结果优于 cLF 组。cLF 组 1 的复发率明显高于 mlF 组(P = 0.036)。cLF 组的恢复工作时间、无疼痛行走时间和能够坐在马桶上无疼痛的时间均较长(P = 0.001)。cLF 组的糜烂和伤口感染率明显高于 mlF 组(P = 0.020 和 P = 0.019)。

结论

mlF 是治疗 PSD 的一种更有效的手术方法,优于 cLF。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验