• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Limberg皮瓣术在藏毛窦的外科治疗中效果更佳。一项对767例患者进行至少五年随访的研究结果。

Limberg flap is better for the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus. Results of a 767 patients series with an at least five years follow-up period.

作者信息

Osmanoglu G, Yetisir F

机构信息

Medicana International Ankara Hospital General Surgery Unit, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Chirurgia (Bucur). 2011 Jul-Aug;106(4):491-4.

PMID:21991875
Abstract

PURPOSE

Pilonidal Sinus Disease (PSD) is an acquired condition usually seen in young adult males. This descriptive retrospective study has been performed to determine effects of primary suture, marsupialization and Limberg Flap for the management of PSD on the outcomes of return to work period, infection and recurrence rates.

METHODS

823 patients were operated by same two surgeons, wide excision was done. Some patients were primarily closed (Group 1), some marsupialized (Group 2) and to a number of patients Classic Limberg (Rhomboid) Flap (Group 3) was applied. The type of the surgery was judged by the operating surgeon. In January 2010, 767 of 823 patients could be reached, and a planned telephone interview was done.

RESULTS

767 patients (85 Female, 682 Male) with the median age of 25.8 were in the study. In "Return To Work (Days)" periods, there is statistically significant difference between groups (p < 0.001). The Return To Work Period is quite shorter in primary closure group compared with marsupialization group. In Limberg Flap Group the surgical site infection rate is the smallest with 4.7%. The highest recurrence rate is in the primary closure group. There is a statistically significant difference (p < 0.001) between the surgery types for the recurrence rates.

CONCLUSION

Because of earlier healing, shorter return to work and lower rates of infection and recurrence, limberg flap is better for PSD.

摘要

目的

藏毛窦疾病(PSD)是一种后天性疾病,常见于年轻成年男性。本描述性回顾性研究旨在确定一期缝合、袋形缝合和林贝格皮瓣术治疗PSD对重返工作时间、感染率和复发率的影响。

方法

823例患者由同两位外科医生进行手术,均行广泛切除。部分患者进行一期缝合(第1组),部分患者行袋形缝合(第2组),对一些患者应用经典林贝格(菱形)皮瓣术(第3组)。手术方式由主刀医生判定。2010年1月,823例患者中有767例取得联系,并进行了计划中的电话访谈。

结果

767例患者(85例女性,682例男性)纳入研究,中位年龄25.8岁。在“重返工作(天数)”方面,各组间存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。一期缝合组的重返工作时间比袋形缝合组短得多。林贝格皮瓣组手术部位感染率最低,为4.7%。一期缝合组复发率最高。手术方式在复发率方面存在统计学显著差异(p<0.001)。

结论

由于愈合早、重返工作时间短以及感染和复发率低,林贝格皮瓣术治疗PSD效果更佳。

相似文献

1
Limberg flap is better for the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus. Results of a 767 patients series with an at least five years follow-up period.Limberg皮瓣术在藏毛窦的外科治疗中效果更佳。一项对767例患者进行至少五年随访的研究结果。
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2011 Jul-Aug;106(4):491-4.
2
Surgical treatment of the pilonidal disease: primary closure or flap reconstruction after excision.藏毛窦疾病的手术治疗:切除后一期缝合或皮瓣重建。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Dec;51(12):1816-22. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9436-8. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
3
Modified Limberg flap reconstruction compares favourably with primary repair for pilonidal sinus surgery.改良Limberg皮瓣重建术在藏毛窦手术中与一期修复相比具有优势。
ANZ J Surg. 2004 Apr;74(4):238-42. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2004.02951.x.
4
Comparison of different surgical options in the treatment of pilonidal disease: retrospective analysis of 175 patients.藏毛窦疾病不同手术方式的比较:175例患者的回顾性分析
Kaohsiung J Med Sci. 2007 Feb;23(2):67-70. doi: 10.1016/S1607-551X(09)70377-8.
5
Randomized comparison of Limberg flap versus modified primary closure for the treatment of pilonidal disease.Limberg皮瓣与改良一期缝合治疗藏毛窦疾病的随机对照研究
Am J Surg. 2010 Jul;200(1):9-14. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2009.05.036.
6
Primary closure or rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for the management of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.原发骶尾部藏毛窦行一期缝合或菱形切除加 Limberg 皮瓣转移术治疗的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02473.x.
7
Modified Limberg transposition flap for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.改良Limberg转位皮瓣治疗骶尾部藏毛窦
Surg Today. 2004;34(5):419-23. doi: 10.1007/s00595-003-2725-x.
8
Lower recurrence rate for Limberg vs. V-Y flap for pilonidal sinus.藏毛窦手术中Limberg皮瓣与V-Y皮瓣相比复发率更低。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Sep;50(9):1436-44. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0276-8.
9
Limberg flap reconstruction for the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease.菱形皮瓣重建术治疗藏毛窦疾病
Chirurgia (Bucur). 2006 Sep-Oct;101(5):513-7.
10
Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study.改良 Karydakis 皮瓣与改良 Limberg 皮瓣治疗藏毛窦病的短期疗效比较:一项随机对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):491-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828006f7.

引用本文的文献

1
Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease.地理因素和手术方式对全球藏毛窦疾病复发的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 22;9(1):15111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51159-z.
2
Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.常见的手术治疗藏毛窦疾病:荟萃分析、合并数据分析和复发的综合研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 15;8(1):3058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20143-4.
3
Comparative analysis of the same technique-the same surgeon approach in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort study.
藏毛窦疾病手术治疗中相同技术-同一外科医生手术方式的对比分析:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2017 Aug;93(2):82-87. doi: 10.4174/astr.2017.93.2.82. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
4
[Pilonidal sinus: Secondary wound closure vs. Limberg flap : Cost and satisfaction analysis].[藏毛窦:二期伤口闭合与林贝格皮瓣:成本与满意度分析]
Chirurg. 2017 Mar;88(3):226-232. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0289-8.
5
Pilonidal sinus disease: risk factors for postoperative complications and recurrence.藏毛窦疾病:术后并发症及复发的危险因素
Int Surg. 2012 Jul-Sep;97(3):224-9. doi: 10.9738/CC86.1.