• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

Mutaf技术的早期结果:藏毛窦手术中一种新型的非中线入路

Early results with the Mutaf technique: a novel off-midline approach in pilonidal sinus surgery.

作者信息

Zorlu Musa, Şahiner İbrahim Tayfun, Zobacı Ethem, Kocak Cem, Yastı Ahmet Çınar, Dolapçı Mete

机构信息

Department of General Surgery, Medical Faculty of Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey.

Department of General Surgery, Çorum Research and Training Hospital, Medical Faculty of Hitit University, Çorum, Turkey.

出版信息

Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 May;90(5):265-71. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.5.265. Epub 2016 May 2.

DOI:10.4174/astr.2016.90.5.265
PMID:27186571
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC4865704/
Abstract

PURPOSE

The objective of the present study was to compare different off-midline techniques in terms of their advantages and disadvantages.

METHODS

A total of 81 patients were included in this prospective, controlled, randomized study. Patients in group 1 were treated with the Limberg flap, and patients in group 2 were treated with Mutaf technique. Patients were followed up for 9 months postsurgically and assessed at regular intervals.

RESULTS

A total of 41 and 40 patients received surgical treatment with Limberg or Mutaf techniques, respectively. The 2 groups were similar in terms of age, gender, body mass index, and Tezel pilonidal sinus classification. Also, the 2 groups were comparable with regard to the frequency of preoperative discharge from the wound site, history of abscess formation, and the resultant antibiotic use. Early results showed similar recurrence rates and surgical-site complications between the 2 groups. Although a lower visual analogue scale score was found in group 2 at postoperative day 1, seroma persistence, time to withdrawal of surgical drains, and wound healing were more prolonged.

CONCLUSION

In this study, Mutaf technique was comparable to Limberg flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus. Therefore, Mutaf technique may be offered as a viable surgical therapeutic option among off-midline closure approaches.

摘要

目的

本研究的目的是比较不同的中线外技术的优缺点。

方法

本前瞻性、对照、随机研究共纳入81例患者。第1组患者采用Limberg皮瓣治疗,第2组患者采用Mutaf技术治疗。术后对患者进行9个月的随访,并定期进行评估。

结果

分别有41例和40例患者接受了Limberg或Mutaf技术的手术治疗。两组在年龄、性别、体重指数和Tezel藏毛窦分类方面相似。此外,两组在伤口部位术前引流频率、脓肿形成病史和抗生素使用情况方面具有可比性。早期结果显示两组之间的复发率和手术部位并发症相似。虽然术后第1天第2组的视觉模拟评分较低,但血清肿持续时间、拔除手术引流管的时间和伤口愈合时间更长。

结论

在本研究中,Mutaf技术在治疗藏毛窦方面与Limberg皮瓣相当。因此,Mutaf技术可作为中线外闭合方法中一种可行的手术治疗选择。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4270/4865704/daf68ea1c9e3/astr-90-265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4270/4865704/daf68ea1c9e3/astr-90-265-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/4270/4865704/daf68ea1c9e3/astr-90-265-g001.jpg

相似文献

1
Early results with the Mutaf technique: a novel off-midline approach in pilonidal sinus surgery.Mutaf技术的早期结果:藏毛窦手术中一种新型的非中线入路
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2016 May;90(5):265-71. doi: 10.4174/astr.2016.90.5.265. Epub 2016 May 2.
2
Randomized prospective comparison of midline and off-midline closure techniques in pilonidal sinus surgery.藏毛窦手术中中线与非中线闭合技术的随机前瞻性比较。
Surgery. 2016 Mar;159(3):749-54. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2015.09.024. Epub 2015 Oct 31.
3
Excision with primary midline closure compared with Limberg flap in the treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease: a randomised clinical trial.与Limberg皮瓣术相比,一期中线缝合切除术治疗骶尾部藏毛疾病的随机临床试验
Ann R Coll Surg Engl. 2019 Jan;101(1):21-29. doi: 10.1308/rcsann.2018.0144. Epub 2018 Oct 5.
4
Surgical treatment of the pilonidal disease: primary closure or flap reconstruction after excision.藏毛窦疾病的手术治疗:切除后一期缝合或皮瓣重建。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2008 Dec;51(12):1816-22. doi: 10.1007/s10350-008-9436-8. Epub 2008 Oct 21.
5
Limberg flap reconstruction for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease with and without acute abscess: Our experience and a review of the literature.林贝格皮瓣重建术治疗伴或不伴急性脓肿的骶尾部藏毛窦疾病:我们的经验及文献综述
Arch Plast Surg. 2019 May;46(3):235-240. doi: 10.5999/aps.2018.01312. Epub 2019 Apr 20.
6
Short and long-term results of the Karydakis flap versus the Limberg flap for treating pilonidal sinus disease: a prospective randomized study.Karydakis 皮瓣与 Limberg 皮瓣治疗藏毛窦疾病的短期和长期疗效:一项前瞻性随机研究。
Am J Surg. 2011 Nov;202(5):568-73. doi: 10.1016/j.amjsurg.2010.10.021. Epub 2011 Jul 23.
7
Comparison of short-term results between the modified Karydakis flap and the modified Limberg flap in the management of pilonidal sinus disease: a randomized controlled study.改良 Karydakis 皮瓣与改良 Limberg 皮瓣治疗藏毛窦病的短期疗效比较:一项随机对照研究。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2013 Apr;56(4):491-8. doi: 10.1097/DCR.0b013e31828006f7.
8
Primary closure or rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for the management of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.原发骶尾部藏毛窦行一期缝合或菱形切除加 Limberg 皮瓣转移术治疗的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02473.x.
9
A comparative analysis of four different surgical methods for treatment of sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus.四种不同手术方法治疗骶尾部藏毛窦的对比分析。
Asian J Surg. 2019 Oct;42(10):907-913. doi: 10.1016/j.asjsur.2018.12.011. Epub 2019 Jan 23.
10
Lower recurrence rate for Limberg vs. V-Y flap for pilonidal sinus.藏毛窦手术中Limberg皮瓣与V-Y皮瓣相比复发率更低。
Dis Colon Rectum. 2007 Sep;50(9):1436-44. doi: 10.1007/s10350-007-0276-8.

引用本文的文献

1
Midline and off-midline wound closure methods after surgical treatment for pilonidal sinus.中线和非中线切口关闭方法在经皮内镜治疗骶尾部藏毛窦术后的应用
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Jan 16;1(1):CD015213. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD015213.pub2.
2
Turkey is leading in the 21 century pilonidal sinus disease research.土耳其在21世纪藏毛窦疾病研究方面处于领先地位。
Turk J Surg. 2020 Sep 28;36(3):284-290. doi: 10.47717/turkjsurg.2020.4750. eCollection 2020 Sep.
3
Surgical procedures in the pilonidal sinus disease: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

本文引用的文献

1
Whole natal cleft excision and flap : an alternative surgical method in extensive sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus disease.全臀裂切除术及皮瓣:广泛骶尾部藏毛窦疾病的一种替代手术方法。
Acta Chir Belg. 2014 Jul-Aug;114(4):266-70.
2
[Pilonidal sinus - possibilities surgical treatment].[藏毛窦——手术治疗的可能性]
Rozhl Chir. 2014 Oct;93(10):491-5.
3
The influence of lifestyle (smoking and body mass index) on wound healing and long-term recurrence rate in 534 primary pilonidal sinus patients.生活方式(吸烟和体重指数)对 534 例原发性藏毛窦患者的伤口愈合和长期复发率的影响。
肛门部藏毛窦疾病的手术治疗:系统评价和网状 Meta 分析。
Sci Rep. 2020 Aug 13;10(1):13720. doi: 10.1038/s41598-020-70641-7.
4
Inverse 'D' incision technique in treatment of pilonidal sinus disease; excision with minimal tissue loss, closure without tension and lateral location of the suture line.倒“D”形切口技术治疗藏毛窦疾病;切除时组织损失最小,无张力缝合,缝线位于外侧。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2019 Nov;97(5):261-265. doi: 10.4174/astr.2019.97.5.261. Epub 2019 Nov 1.
5
Impact of geography and surgical approach on recurrence in global pilonidal sinus disease.地理因素和手术方式对全球藏毛窦疾病复发的影响。
Sci Rep. 2019 Oct 22;9(1):15111. doi: 10.1038/s41598-019-51159-z.
6
A systematic review of classification systems for pilonidal sinus.对肛门周围窦道分类系统的系统评价。
Tech Coloproctol. 2019 May;23(5):435-443. doi: 10.1007/s10151-019-01988-x. Epub 2019 May 16.
7
Common surgical procedures in pilonidal sinus disease: A meta-analysis, merged data analysis, and comprehensive study on recurrence.常见的手术治疗藏毛窦疾病:荟萃分析、合并数据分析和复发的综合研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 15;8(1):3058. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-20143-4.
8
Evaluation of intradermal absorbable and mattress sutures to close pilonidal sinus wounds with Limberg flap: a prospective randomized comparative study.皮内可吸收缝线与褥式缝线用于Limberg皮瓣闭合藏毛窦伤口的评估:一项前瞻性随机对照研究。
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2018 Feb;94(2):88-93. doi: 10.4174/astr.2018.94.2.88. Epub 2018 Jan 30.
9
Comparative analysis of the same technique-the same surgeon approach in the surgical treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective cohort study.藏毛窦疾病手术治疗中相同技术-同一外科医生手术方式的对比分析:一项回顾性队列研究
Ann Surg Treat Res. 2017 Aug;93(2):82-87. doi: 10.4174/astr.2017.93.2.82. Epub 2017 Jul 28.
10
A New Surgical Technique for Closure of Pilonidal Sinus Defects: Triangular Closure Technique.一种用于闭合藏毛窦缺损的新手术技术:三角形闭合技术。
Med Sci Monit. 2017 Feb 26;23:1033-1042. doi: 10.12659/msm.899879.
Int J Colorectal Dis. 2013 Nov;28(11):1555-62. doi: 10.1007/s00384-013-1731-8. Epub 2013 Jun 20.
4
Limberg flap versus Bascom cleft lift techniques for sacrococcygeal pilonidal sinus: prospective, randomized trial.Limberg 皮瓣与 Bascom 裂沟提升术治疗骶尾部藏毛窦的前瞻性随机试验。
World J Surg. 2013 Sep;37(9):2074-80. doi: 10.1007/s00268-013-2111-9.
5
Specimen index may be a predictive factor for recurrence after primary closure of pilonidal disease.标本指数可能是藏毛疾病一期缝合后复发的一个预测因素。
J Korean Surg Soc. 2012 Dec;83(6):367-73. doi: 10.4174/jkss.2012.83.6.367. Epub 2012 Nov 27.
6
Ambulatory treatment of chronic pilonidal sinuses with lateral incision and primary suture.门诊治疗慢性藏毛窦的侧切开术和一期缝合术。
Can J Surg. 2011 Apr;54(2):78-82. doi: 10.1503/cjs.026309.
7
Primary closure or rhomboid excision and Limberg flap for the management of primary sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease? A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.原发骶尾部藏毛窦行一期缝合或菱形切除加 Limberg 皮瓣转移术治疗的疗效比较:一项随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Colorectal Dis. 2012 Feb;14(2):143-51. doi: 10.1111/j.1463-1318.2010.02473.x.
8
Comparison of the classic Limberg flap and modified Limberg flap in the treatment of pilonidal sinus disease: a retrospective analysis of 416 patients.经典 Limberg 皮瓣与改良 Limberg 皮瓣治疗藏毛窦疾病的比较:416 例回顾性分析。
Surg Today. 2010 Aug;40(8):757-62. doi: 10.1007/s00595-008-4098-7. Epub 2010 Jul 30.
9
Open excision with secondary healing versus rhomboid excision with Limberg transposition flap in the management of sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.开放性切除二期愈合与菱形切除联合Limberg转移皮瓣治疗骶尾部藏毛窦疾病的比较
J Pak Med Assoc. 2009 Mar;59(3):157-60.
10
Cleft lift procedure for sacrococcygeal pilonidal disease.骶尾部藏毛窦疾病的臀沟提升术
Dis Colon Rectum. 2009 Jan;52(1):135-9. doi: 10.1007/DCR.0b013e31819734f8.