Department of Surgery, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA 19104, USA.
Liver Transpl. 2010 Aug;16(8):943-9. doi: 10.1002/lt.22091.
Translational studies in liver transplantation often require an endpoint of graft function or dysfunction beyond graft loss. Prior definitions of early allograft dysfunction (EAD) vary, and none have been validated in a large multicenter population in the Model for End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) era. We examined an updated definition of EAD to validate previously used criteria, and correlated this definition with graft and patient outcome. We performed a cohort study of 300 deceased donor liver transplants at 3 U.S. programs. EAD was defined as the presence of one or more of the following previously defined postoperative laboratory analyses reflective of liver injury and function: bilirubin >or=10mg/dL on day 7, international normalized ratio >or=1.6 on day 7, and alanine or aspartate aminotransferases >2000 IU/L within the first 7 days. To assess predictive validity, the EAD definition was tested for association with graft and patient survival. Risk factors for EAD were assessed using multivariable logistic regression. Overall incidence of EAD was 23.2%. Most grafts met the definition with increased bilirubin at day 7 or high levels of aminotransferases. Of recipients meeting the EAD definition, 18.8% died, as opposed to 1.8% of recipients without EAD (relative risk = 10.7 [95% confidence interval: 3.6, 31.9] P < 0.0001). More recipients with EAD lost their grafts (26.1%) than recipients with no EAD (3.5%) (relative risk = 7.4 [95% confidence interval: 3.4, 16.3] P < 0.0001). Donor age and MELD score were significant EAD risk factors in a multivariate model. In summary a simple definition of EAD using objective posttransplant criteria identified a 23% incidence, and was highly associated with graft loss and patient mortality, validating previously published criteria. This definition can be used as an endpoint in translational studies aiming to identify mechanistic pathways leading to a subgroup of liver grafts with clinical expression of suboptimal function.
肝移植的转化研究通常需要一个移植物功能或功能障碍的终点,而不是移植物丢失。早期移植物功能障碍(EAD)的先前定义各不相同,并且在 MELD 时代的大型多中心人群中尚未得到验证。我们检查了 EAD 的更新定义,以验证以前使用的标准,并将该定义与移植物和患者的结果相关联。我们在美国的 3 个项目中对 300 例已故供体肝移植进行了队列研究。EAD 的定义为存在以下一种或多种先前定义的术后实验室分析,反映了肝损伤和功能:第 7 天胆红素> = 10mg/dL,第 7 天国际标准化比值> = 1.6,第 7 天内天丙氨酸或天冬氨酸转氨酶> 2000IU/L。为了评估预测有效性,EAD 定义用于评估与移植物和患者生存率的相关性。使用多变量逻辑回归评估 EAD 的危险因素。EAD 的总发生率为 23.2%。大多数移植物符合第 7 天胆红素升高或转氨酶水平升高的定义。符合 EAD 定义的患者中有 18.8%死亡,而不符合 EAD 定义的患者中有 1.8%(相对风险= 10.7 [95%置信区间:3.6,31.9] P <0.0001)。EAD 组有更多的受者失去移植物(26.1%),而无 EAD 组的受者则更少(3.5%)(相对风险= 7.4 [95%置信区间:3.4,16.3] P <0.0001)。在多变量模型中,供体年龄和 MELD 评分是 EAD 的重要危险因素。总之,使用客观移植后标准的 EAD 简单定义确定了 23%的发生率,与移植物丢失和患者死亡率高度相关,验证了以前发表的标准。该定义可作为旨在确定具有临床表达功能不佳的亚组肝移植物的机制途径的转化研究的终点。