Suppr超能文献

下面部高度变化对面部吸引力及非专业人士对治疗需求认知的影响。

Influence of lower facial height changes on frontal facial attractiveness and perception of treatment need by lay people.

机构信息

Department of Orthodontics, Gazi University Faculty of Dentistry, Ankara, Turkey.

出版信息

Angle Orthod. 2010 Nov;80(6):1159-64. doi: 10.2319/032509-176.1.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE

To test the hypothesis that lower facial height has no influence on frontal facial attractiveness and treatment need perception of lay people.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Frontal facial silhouettes of a man and a woman with normal lower facial height values (male: 81.5 mm; female: 70.5 mm) were modified by increasing and decreasing their lower facial heights in steps of 1 mm to obtain frontal images with different lower facial height alterations ranging from +6 mm to -6 mm for each sex. A panel of 100 lay people scored each silhouette's attractiveness on a 100-mm visual analogue scale (VAS) and also indicated whether they would seek treatment if the image represented their own. The Wilcoxon signed rank test was used to compare the VAS scores.

RESULTS

Unaltered +/-1-mm and +/-2-mm silhouettes got the highest VAS scores. Scores were significantly lower (P < or = .001) as the divergence from the normal value exceeded 2 mm. Beyond +3 mm and -4 mm in females and +4 mm and -3 mm in males the difference between the scores became statistically insignificant. At +/-4 mm, more than 75% of the raters elected to have treatment.

CONCLUSION

The hypothesis was rejected.

摘要

目的

验证低下面高对面部正面吸引力和非专业人士治疗需求感知没有影响的假设。

材料与方法

通过将男性(81.5 毫米)和女性(70.5 毫米)正常下面高值增加和减少 1 毫米,分别获得男性和女性正面面部轮廓的不同下面高变化。正面图像的下面高变化范围从每个性别+6 毫米到-6 毫米。100 名非专业人士组成的小组使用 100 毫米视觉模拟量表(VAS)对每个轮廓的吸引力进行评分,并表示如果图像代表自己,他们是否会寻求治疗。使用 Wilcoxon 符号秩检验比较 VAS 评分。

结果

未经改变的 +/-1-mm 和 +/-2-mm 轮廓获得了最高的 VAS 评分。当偏离正常值超过 2 毫米时,评分明显降低(P<or=0.001)。在女性中超过+3 毫米和-4 毫米以及男性中超过+4 毫米和-3 毫米时,评分之间的差异变得没有统计学意义。在 +/-4 毫米时,超过 75%的评价者选择进行治疗。

结论

假设被拒绝。

相似文献

2
The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Aug;27(4):349-54. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji023. Epub 2005 Jun 16.
3
A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Dec;128(6):690-6; quiz 801. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.030.
4
Perception of facial profile attractiveness of different antero-posterior and vertical proportions.
Eur J Orthod. 2011 Feb;33(1):103-11. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjq028. Epub 2010 Jun 17.
5
Assessed facial normality after Twin Block therapy.
Eur J Orthod. 2010 Aug;32(4):363-70. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjp141. Epub 2010 Feb 4.
8
Smile attractiveness related to buccal corridor space in 3 different facial types: A perception of 3 ethnic groups of Malaysians.
J Prosthet Dent. 2018 Aug;120(2):252-256. doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2017.10.021. Epub 2018 Mar 16.
9
The role of the posed smile in overall facial esthetics.
Angle Orthod. 2010 Mar;80(2):322-8. doi: 10.2319/040409-194.1.
10
Influence on smile attractiveness of the smile arc in conjunction with gingival display.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2013 Oct;144(4):541-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2013.05.006.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Artificial Intelligence to Quantify Sexual Dimorphism in Aesthetic Faces: Analysis of 100 Facial Points in 42 Caucasian Celebrities.
Aesthet Surg J Open Forum. 2023 Jun 5;5:ojad046. doi: 10.1093/asjof/ojad046. eCollection 2023.
2
Valid 3D surface superimposition references to assess facial changes during growth.
Sci Rep. 2021 Aug 12;11(1):16456. doi: 10.1038/s41598-021-95942-3.
3
Thresholds of Abnormality Perception in Facial Esthetics among Laypersons and Dental Professionals: Frontal Esthetics.
Int J Dent. 2020 Oct 17;2020:8946063. doi: 10.1155/2020/8946063. eCollection 2020.
5
The Influence of the Smile on the Perceived Facial Type Esthetics.
Biomed Res Int. 2018 Jul 9;2018:3562916. doi: 10.1155/2018/3562916. eCollection 2018.
6
Soft tissue profile changes after Functional Mandibular Advancer or Herbst appliance treatment in class II patients.
Clin Oral Investig. 2018 Mar;22(2):971-980. doi: 10.1007/s00784-017-2177-0. Epub 2017 Jul 18.
7
Three-Dimensional Anthropometric Database of Attractive Caucasian Women: Standards and Comparisons.
J Craniofac Surg. 2016 Oct;27(7):1884-1895. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0000000000002933.
8
Alveolar and Skeletal Chin Dimensions Associated with Lower Facial Height Among Different Divergent Patterns.
J Clin Diagn Res. 2016 May;10(5):ZC75-80. doi: 10.7860/JCDR/2016/19932.7811. Epub 2016 May 1.
9
Relationship between perception of malocclusion and the psychological impact of dental aesthetics in university students.
J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Feb 1;7(1):e18-22. doi: 10.4317/jced.52157. eCollection 2015 Feb.
10
Influence of chin height on perceived attractiveness in the orthognathic patient, layperson, and clinician.
Angle Orthod. 2012 Jan;82(1):88-95. doi: 10.2319/050111-311.1. Epub 2011 Jul 25.

本文引用的文献

1
Age-related changes of the dental aesthetic zone at rest and during spontaneous smiling and speech.
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Aug;30(4):366-73. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjn009. Epub 2008 Jul 16.
2
Panel perception of change in facial aesthetics following orthodontic treatment in adolescents.
Eur J Orthod. 2008 Apr;30(2):141-6. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm114. Epub 2008 Feb 8.
3
Attractiveness of facial profiles as rated by individuals with different levels of education.
J Orofac Orthop. 2008 Jan;69(1):20-30. doi: 10.1007/s00056-008-0735-4.
4
The impact of buccal corridors on smile attractiveness.
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Oct;29(5):530-7. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjm063.
5
Influence of panel composition on aesthetic evaluation of adolescent faces.
Eur J Orthod. 2007 Feb;29(1):95-9. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cjl060.
6
Influence of lips on the perception of malocclusion.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2006 Aug;130(2):152-62. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.11.036.
8
A comparison of providers' and consumers' perceptions of facial-profile attractiveness.
Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop. 2005 Dec;128(6):690-6; quiz 801. doi: 10.1016/j.ajodo.2004.09.030.
9
Ranking facial attractiveness.
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Aug;27(4):340-8. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji042.
10
The influence of lower face vertical proportion on facial attractiveness.
Eur J Orthod. 2005 Aug;27(4):349-54. doi: 10.1093/ejo/cji023. Epub 2005 Jun 16.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验