Suppr超能文献

成年中国汉族男性下颌隆突与上颌中切牙矢状位的锥形束计算机断层扫描成像作为美学轮廓的决定因素

Cone beam computed tomography imaging of sagittal positions of the mandibular prominence and maxillary central incisors in adult Chinese Han men as an aesthetic profile determinant.

作者信息

Miao Pei, Gao Jie, Lu Zhiyao, Jin Zuolin

机构信息

State Key Laboratory of Military Stomatology & National Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases & Shaanxi Clinical Research Center for Oral Diseases, Department of Orthodontics, School of Stomatology, The Fourth Military Medical University.

Department of Stomatology, Xi'an First Hospital, Xi'an, Shaanxi, China.

出版信息

Medicine (Baltimore). 2020 Oct 23;99(43):e22778. doi: 10.1097/MD.0000000000022778.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

To analyze the sagittal positions of the mandibular prominence and maxillary central incisors in adult Chinese Han men to establish their aesthetic profile characteristics.

METHODS

Seventy-four Chinese Han men aged 18 to 40 years underwent cone beam computed tomography for detecting the distances between Glabella and Subnasale, Subnasale and Menthon of soft tissue, Condyle and Gonion, Pogonion and Pogonion's Anterior Limit Line, Facial Axis point of maxillary central incisor and the Goal Anterior Limit Line as well as the angle of the Occlusal Plane. Dolphin Imaging and Photoshop software packages were used to generate silhouette profiles. Thirteen orthodontists assessed the silhouette profiles and assigned visual analog scale scores. Scores >70 were assigned to the aesthetic (group 1), scores of 60to 70 to the general (group 2), scores of 50 to 60 to the acceptable (group 3), and scores of <50 to the unaesthetic profile (group 4).

RESULTS

A total of 15 men were assigned to group 1, 35 to group 2, 14 to group 3, and 10 to group 4. There were no significant differences in the variables examined between groups 1, 2, and 3, but comparing group 1 with group 4, Pogonion and Pogonion's Anterior Limit Line (1.16 ± 2.61 mm vs -1.44 ± 2.92 mm, P = .046) and Facial Axis-Goal Anterior Limit Line (-0.61 ± 2.54 mm vs 1.70 ± 2.62 mm, P = .038) there were significant differences.

CONCLUSION

Compared with the unaesthetic profile group, the sagittal positions of the maxillary central incisors were slightly posterior, and the chin was slightly anterior in adult Chinese Han men with an aesthetic profile.

摘要

背景

分析成年中国汉族男性下颌隆突和上颌中切牙的矢状位,以确立其美学轮廓特征。

方法

74名年龄在18至40岁的中国汉族男性接受锥形束计算机断层扫描,以检测眉间点与鼻下点、鼻下点与软组织颏下点、髁突与下颌角点、颏前点与颏前点的前界限线、上颌中切牙的面轴点与目标前界限线之间的距离以及咬合平面角度。使用Dolphin Imaging和Photoshop软件包生成侧面轮廓。13名正畸医生评估侧面轮廓并给出视觉模拟量表评分。评分>70分为美学组(第1组),评分60至70分为一般组(第2组),评分50至60分为可接受组(第3组),评分<50分为非美学轮廓组(第4组)。

结果

共有15名男性被分配到第1组,35名到第2组,14名到第3组,10名到第4组。第1、2和3组之间所检查的变量无显著差异,但将第1组与第4组比较,颏前点与颏前点的前界限线(1.16±2.61mm对-1.44±2.92mm,P=0.046)和面轴-目标前界限线(-0.61±2.54mm对1.70±2.62mm,P=0.038)有显著差异。

结论

与非美学轮廓组相比,具有美学轮廓的成年中国汉族男性上颌中切牙的矢状位略向后,下巴略向前。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/fe08/7581121/c903e030635b/medi-99-e22778-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验