• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

灵活处理交叉危险问题的方法。

A flexible approach to the crossing hazards problem.

机构信息

Dipartimento di Scienze Statistiche e Matematiche S. Vianelli, Università di Palermo, viale delle Scienze, ed. 13, 90128 Palermo, Italy.

出版信息

Stat Med. 2010 Aug 15;29(18):1947-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.3959.

DOI:10.1002/sim.3959
PMID:20680987
Abstract

We propose a simple and flexible framework for the crossing hazards problem. The method is not confined to two-sample problems, but may also work with continuous exposure variables whose effect changes its sign at some time-point of the observed follow-up time. Penalized partial likelihood estimation relies upon the assumption of a smooth hazard ratio via low-rank basis splines with a conventional difference penalty to ensure smoothness, and additional ad hoc penalties to obtain restricted estimates useful in the context of crossing hazards. The framework naturally also leads to a statistical test that has good power for revealing a global effect under several alternatives, including crossing hazards. We provide the results from a real-data analysis and from some simulations to illustrate empirically the performance of the proposed approach as compared with the possible alternatives.

摘要

我们提出了一个简单而灵活的框架来处理交叉风险问题。该方法不仅限于两样本问题,也可以用于连续暴露变量,当观察随访时间的某个时间点时,其效应会改变符号。惩罚部分似然估计依赖于通过低秩基样条假设平滑风险比,通过常规差分惩罚来确保平滑性,并额外使用特定的惩罚来获得在交叉风险情况下有用的受限估计。该框架自然也导致了一个统计检验,在几种替代方案(包括交叉风险)下,该检验对揭示全局效应具有良好的功效。我们提供了实际数据分析和一些模拟结果,以经验方式说明与可能的替代方案相比,所提出方法的性能。

相似文献

1
A flexible approach to the crossing hazards problem.灵活处理交叉危险问题的方法。
Stat Med. 2010 Aug 15;29(18):1947-57. doi: 10.1002/sim.3959.
2
Variable selection for proportional odds model.比例优势模型的变量选择
Stat Med. 2007 Sep 10;26(20):3771-81. doi: 10.1002/sim.2833.
3
A regression survival model for testing the proportional hazards hypothesis.用于检验比例风险假设的回归生存模型。
Biometrics. 1996 Sep;52(3):874-85.
4
Polynomial spline estimation and inference of proportional hazards regression models with flexible relative risk form.具有灵活相对风险形式的比例风险回归模型的多项式样条估计与推断
Biometrics. 2006 Sep;62(3):793-802. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2005.00519.x.
5
Flexible modeling of competing risks in survival analysis.生存分析中竞争风险的灵活建模。
Stat Med. 2010 Oct 15;29(23):2453-68. doi: 10.1002/sim.4005.
6
Spline-based tests in survival analysis.生存分析中基于样条的检验。
Biometrics. 1994 Sep;50(3):640-52.
7
Cox models with dynamic ridge penalties on time-varying effects of the covariates.
Stat Med. 2014 Jan 15;33(1):170-80. doi: 10.1002/sim.5921. Epub 2013 Aug 2.
8
Estimating survival curves with left-truncated and interval-censored data under monotone hazards.在单调风险下使用左截断和区间删失数据估计生存曲线。
Biometrics. 1998 Sep;54(3):1053-60.
9
Joint analysis of time-to-event and multiple binary indicators of latent classes.对事件发生时间和潜在类别多个二元指标的联合分析。
Biometrics. 2004 Mar;60(1):85-92. doi: 10.1111/j.0006-341X.2004.00141.x.
10
Reduced-rank hazard regression for modelling non-proportional hazards.用于对非比例风险进行建模的降秩风险回归。
Stat Med. 2006 Aug 30;25(16):2831-45. doi: 10.1002/sim.2360.

引用本文的文献

1
Bayesian test for hazard ratio in survival analysis.生存分析中风险比的贝叶斯检验。
Springerplus. 2016 May 17;5:649. doi: 10.1186/s40064-016-2210-9. eCollection 2016.